From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:20:35 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] MMC: fix sdhci-dove removal In-Reply-To: <508F0027.1010102@gmail.com> (Sebastian Hesselbarth's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:16:07 +0100") References: <20121015094348.GP21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121015103725.GQ21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121015104456.GR21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87txtdq90y.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <20121029214307.GH21164@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87vcdtosnx.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> <508F0027.1010102@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87mwz4q5sc.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Mon, Oct 29 2012, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 10/29/2012 10:49 PM, Chris Ball wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 29 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> Anyway, here's a replacement patch, updated against my cubox tree but >>> lacking the cubox gpio changes for it. Un-tested through: (a) I can't >>> test this on its own on the cubox, (b) I don't have a separate dove >>> tree to test it against and my disk space is all but out at the moment >>> for yet another build tree... >> >> Compile-tested and pushed to mmc-next, and I'll submit it for 3.7 if >> I get a Tested-by from someone like Sebastian (CC'd), or for 3.8 if I >> don't. (I'll add sdhci-pltfm API rework to my TODO list, too.) > > Chris, Russell, > > obviously I am not the one to ask for a Tested-by because it was my > patch that originally caused all the trouble. My apologies for this! > > Anyway, I did test the patch on 3.7-rc3 and except that you need a > 3-way git am because of a one-line offset, sdhci-dove runs just fine. > > Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth Great, thanks -- will push to 3.7. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child