From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47926C3DA7F for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 09:57:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=weetxJmtLY1cKNQbg86zrhIOgcbPA/fjVq4T3M5ovLc=; b=RSIDcTXzIdkyJMnShIlb/cHFiA frUxaIiKrgh3I5zFYf1A66JGqG8I16ELs9BXRSVVrPMWEWr6RPPE68xkcC5UcK17ajn+2uEKKFA5l F41ELJqMDaMzrC6OtC5Xt+0cHG+N9gPTxRpi5Qj/Yoz40ylH+zc+WCkYt/hxMyBcfiThCGGyFOiJC 5IxoYkUrws/4sBho4XCOuXObO1I1VaTBJ1oBeny/GjS/evFzBpIY7JO3L+DJjvhWn1Z8J/kh+qUiG Fy3Pi0NqKr/HyhseBqAQagO6GzSZTHEZ5u0PB8InepkoMMw2lNtL53lXOadsVq+LwV6TIFVscl3qn eHxvocBA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1saXys-0000000D2wG-0yDf; Sun, 04 Aug 2024 09:56:50 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1saXyK-0000000D2nS-3oo0; Sun, 04 Aug 2024 09:56:18 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87169CE0947; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 09:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23D25C32786; Sun, 4 Aug 2024 09:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722765373; bh=6GYgW1pBDBnhlAKtizrPp43IWcryMt4Azi1dzXoCvgc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oDiLJOnwzA0J4o0OpLS6Q0pkgt/1WpuYclKUFXXJHLAwMsSp+GfesATO+Mg0DwIUU mncuCeSX1ffvQ0SFplZhTAyQq/9ivBchR7ZZkQ8D5orkq+MYOvQaqgFIHsom9vSinV 7RR/QDDCemM+0blfVkS/DHE4HEv0vZBDzSiYA9SyFlCt6ZiIzLtGejwlGx8iU/9b6W jDhLIq4ZFZnjGwZxWL67wAHXMZ4zUMfY+unU94Qc8rXQuNr+Mxxcpy8DbHawHU3KZ2 JPgG9cLXr8fvFsfV+RmBusS9ziPscrH9qo3leD7VK1Cxe9QAzph40WdBoGmEEd5GNI ZT2AeIGJNvE8Q== From: Kalle Valo To: Shengyu Qu Cc: kernel test robot , nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo@kernel.org, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, shayne.chen@mediatek.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, chui-hao.chiu@mediatek.com, emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, StanleyYP.Wang@mediatek.com, meichia.chiu@mediatek.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, quic_adisi@quicinc.com, allen.ye@mediatek.com, bo.jiao@mediatek.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Sujuan Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] wifi: mt76: mt7915: add wds support when wed is enabled References: <202408041039.BqVRJOqp-lkp@intel.com> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 12:56:07 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Shengyu Qu's message of "Sun, 4 Aug 2024 17:28:20 +0800") Message-ID: <87o7687gso.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240804_025617_143487_2FBA1BE7 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.79 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Shengyu Qu writes: > This error report is a false warning. "struct mtk_wed_device" needs > "CONFIG_NET_MEDIATEK_SOC_WED" to be defined. I didn't investigate anything but based on your description that sounds wrong. The code should should not be compiled if it depends on CONFIG_NET_MEDIATEK_SOC_WED but that's not set. We have zero rule for compilation errors or warnings. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches