linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org, ast@kernel.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout()
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:57:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plbwk5y2.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMLdZyjYqFY1xxFD@arm.com>


Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 08:46:55PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Switch out the conditional load inerfaces used by rqspinlock
>> to smp_cond_read_acquire_timeout().
>> This interface handles the timeout check explicitly and does any
>> necessary amortization, so use check_timeout() directly.
>
> It's worth mentioning that the default smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout()
> implementation (without hardware support) only spins 200 times instead
> of 16K times in the rqspinlock code. That's probably fine but it would
> be good to have confirmation from Kumar or Alexei.

As Kumar mentions, I'll redefine the count locally in rqspinlock.c to 16k.

>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c b/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
>> index 5ab354d55d82..4d2c12d131ae 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c
> [...]
>> @@ -313,11 +307,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(resilient_tas_spin_lock);
>>   */
>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, rqnodes[_Q_MAX_NODES]);
>>
>> -#ifndef res_smp_cond_load_acquire
>> -#define res_smp_cond_load_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire(v, c)
>> -#endif
>> -
>> -#define res_atomic_cond_read_acquire(v, c) res_smp_cond_load_acquire(&(v)->counter, (c))
>> +#define res_atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout(v, c, t)		\
>> +	smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(&(v)->counter, (c), (t))
>
> BTW, we have atomic_cond_read_acquire() which accesses the 'counter' of
> an atomic_t. You might as well add an atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout()
> in atomic.h than open-code the atomic_t internals here.

Good point. That also keeps it close to the locking/qspinlock.c
use of atomic_cond_read_acquire().

Will add atomic_cond_read_acquire_timeout() (and other variants that
we define in include/linux/atomic.h).

> Otherwise the patch looks fine to me, much simpler than the previous
> attempt.
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Thanks!

--
ankur


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11  3:46 [PATCH v5 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-09-11  3:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-09-18 19:42   ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19 23:41     ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-22 10:47       ` Will Deacon
2025-09-11  3:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] arm64: " Ankur Arora
2025-09-18 20:05   ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19 16:18     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-19 22:39       ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-11  3:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait Ankur Arora
2025-09-11  3:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-09-11  3:46 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-09-11 14:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-11 18:54     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-09-11 21:58       ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-12 10:14         ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-12 18:06           ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-11 18:56     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-09-11 21:57     ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2025-09-11 14:34 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Catalin Marinas
2025-09-11 21:57   ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-15 11:12     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-16  5:29       ` Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87plbwk5y2.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).