From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Petteri Kangaslampi <pekangas@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] KVM: arm64: Fix hyp VA size between layout and MMU
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:34:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87qzscdlvi.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223193440.1441657-1-pekangas@google.com>
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:34:39 +0000,
Petteri Kangaslampi <pekangas@google.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> In the KVM initialization code, kvm_mmu_init() and
> kvm_compute_layout() use different logic when determining the
> hypervisor's virtual address space size. Specifically, the MMU code
> uses the larger of vabits_actual (the kernel's VA size) and
> IDMAP_VA_BITS (48 bits), while the VA layout code just uses the
> kernel's VA size.
>
> This means that if the kernel is configured with a VA size of less
> than 48 bits (like happens in our environment), the assumptions used
> to calculate hyp_physvirt_offset and the code that determines VA
> ranges to use for mappings in hyp/nvhe/mm.c get out of sync, which can
> results in mapping failures.
>
> The immediate fix is pretty obvious and attached here. This is against
> 6.12 but I don't think this code has changed recently. I think longer
> term refactoring knowledge of the hypervisor's address space into one
> place might be helpful; currently it is a bit spread out.
I'm sorry, but posting a patch against a kernel that is over a year
old doesn't help. It may apply, but it doesn't mean it works. Please
post a tested patch against the latest released kernel, or even
better, the latest -rc.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz isn't dead. It just smells funny.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-30 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 19:34 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: arm64: Fix hyp VA size between layout and MMU Petteri Kangaslampi
2025-12-23 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Petteri Kangaslampi
2025-12-30 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-12-30 15:34 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87qzscdlvi.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pekangas@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).