From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76840C48BEB for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:10:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9rq8Bmyo621vdQkOUfXHEhbbFCCMhdABB9Pm/24c7T4=; b=Qbz/Fla8WMjkTC nHkjGyA3AA24GHaOIA3GnKxEUeKA2Vn8OGIl9h0a8uM6bziI2ZyjBCpatYF/5eHrfMEBdGs9QwpC0 K1I6hz5yQq14JW4T5ODq4LKSWzfm07x1NtlToLtDILvM6mxsAAv/qKBkDVRaY7hQFST+X70WrrWR8 uHexvKnKcaEMmAEoBbbirhxNo0XJzOoFHd9B4wtoZMafezZXpvfYisnpHQtnlmsftvXBVTZuosZOn vIPDbKC72mYKdy+K0evVg3eth/SGdlnwA5u2MFWrSiL/1IeoUqJFSlyvnS5gyYCvvL18NT6mIMv60 mzSv2x8Pw7aX0MBsKlxg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rd55g-00000004BDz-0Go0; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:10:04 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rd55e-00000004BBQ-08lP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:10:03 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708592998; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5z2LjmcVYTTtMHfSdE+4c74yPQ1zKXSnEQ+04Bz2RkY=; b=UgKR69bQdIaerpq+JNmiLebU1rcg9CZn5gOrCy9Z7Au+B6/hnjcowGl2DTm9VeWEAEoZmK oCEjcGDupb2MBtxKLJ7rZvAeHhXnxt/ZnPYvDoHUvoTrsPnwiWz+9kf/ISwtY8uq2ocO5j B5wNwlRm27RYp0op7gHfHMtUeH4rZaI= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-661-5upeQe3gNWu03ny4eztwpw-1; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:09:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5upeQe3gNWu03ny4eztwpw-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-511a4a286f2so6608654e87.3 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 01:09:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708592996; x=1709197796; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5z2LjmcVYTTtMHfSdE+4c74yPQ1zKXSnEQ+04Bz2RkY=; b=snLRpTuVMFHc6zweslSWcbVwRmP1b55fwfdv3/kwkZoq6b/OKDW9KyG22nskySgVS/ oeayz/6uUypF4Zu+1pmN8UBps7CFk0rKVISxq9Q2Kqgcnt/OWVLMMRno78jRtKSVIe95 XzBtX5rNtlRKwVnnK9pWL4j53CZv8WvuWBWg0SFSvMODvoXfwuBUxowO1mQctYhX2y6o wNKxpiMcxUFFy9bLj6x71q5/7OeaMRw+RydJzVOBESOk5ZRu397eKXSksgjfhNe61EXP vGm5vdMOB+e5cNkMM8OSd8KVYrWohEoO/WjFKawles66cQUgH6pBcrbW4tgMLegF7wWs YxfQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWyBCA9mx+MSNhlg+8rCFtK2R9t7MunvaBpcnHhA+wsRvAJaEHxseiVLnStWqMhcc56q6NKgrKI4K2cczKc2gzmpiyi9sW6JCALzPSk96zUFpURDgg= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzAWmBmPQv0e0Hz7QVpEgUIxygztOhgbO6ccNbGcxxeTwj5mZbb lLhxgtBQRWxjTYROx0muVO1p/YDK5STNCaa+SBfKJPf0l1fY4HOReUOGcqwKfxPqBgKx/WsGbmm QCMplkf5GsXWGtK6jff7apa8EG3eTFbqE4ZAi72YQbQKT0HQTUW/cOzKo/DZ0hDwrbBlu1YCk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:34cc:b0:512:d643:8ce0 with SMTP id w12-20020a05651234cc00b00512d6438ce0mr2265906lfr.3.1708592996082; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 01:09:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHUfQ8/pcELa6/T5KDQWDZsKcrbNfqYNrm0L3u4xqUXs43U22KoHb268lI/Y9EyTKszcVyvVA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:34cc:b0:512:d643:8ce0 with SMTP id w12-20020a05651234cc00b00512d6438ce0mr2265896lfr.3.1708592995763; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 01:09:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (205.pool92-176-231.dynamic.orange.es. [92.176.231.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18-20020a05600c451200b0040fd1629443sm21435438wmo.18.2024.02.22.01.09.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Feb 2024 01:09:55 -0800 (PST) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Maxime Ripard Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Enric Balletbo i Serra , Erico Nunes , Brian Masney , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Andersson , Catalin Marinas , Geert Uytterhoeven , Konrad Dybcio , Marek Szyprowski , Neil Armstrong , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable zram, xfs and loading compressed FW support In-Reply-To: References: <20240221141350.3740488-1-javierm@redhat.com> <1f28256c-e436-4add-aa67-2cfb2248b220@linaro.org> <6scz7iti3tzzrd4ph3gnuc2pvkcbtuuicgfgujh3pa3c34kdkt@bhfa4xbxeu7t> <9083c414-62f2-4bff-93ee-13f8ff60eb34@linaro.org> <874je1ipb4.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:09:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87r0h47tlp.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240222_011002_198538_88D24E3F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.75 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Krzysztof Kozlowski writes: > On 21/02/2024 20:34, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [...] >>> >>> Any explanation what ZRAM is necessary for Fedora to boot. >>> >> >> I mentioned already in another email, Fedora is enabling the systemd >> zram-generator and not having a /dev/zram0 slows down the boot to the >> point of being unusable. One could disable that service but then is yet > > That one sentence would be enough for me. > I'll add that then to the commit message when proposing a config fragment. [...] >> >> So that means that for aarch64, some filesystems have more precedence over >> others? It's OK to have ext4 or btrfs but no xfs? Honestly it seems quite >> arbitrary and subjective for me. > > Yes, subjective, but to be honest: I would drop Btrfs. I was thinking Fair. If the agreegment is to minimize defconfig (which AFAIU is your point), then I'm on board with it. We can start splitting in separate fragments, people can then mix and match for their specific use cases. > about it, but since Arnd agrees on XFS I won't fight that battle. > Yeah, it was a strange hill for me to die on and is true that fragments seems to be the best compromise, as Maxime said before in this thread. By the way, I want to apologize for my harsh/rude comments yesterday. I wasn't in the best mood and I got too emotional... -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel