From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62D6CD98F5 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:28:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:References:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=oyDNZ1JZU1JVaeSYhuaAEh8D6Z4x1EwKB1l7hD/a/iI=; b=szw8xhR2yl3ojZ bT3+PZeD4UFcC461W9AEYQU0MjT64FI8oUduNa4IiQ8H2goTBAxuJIQFeS9FLxXTSR6uDTILwV0fi KPOTKjvBPTM1dFXVQHVK6Yube40ccr/Cf7cCy1A3Ls/K4iOUl1W1SjjhmkTG49rV/8kcLOY94WVIn RbMlOEDUOtm3u5vafPiVXAJCzvLRPlreFFaF8Fn1YeULVquTvB+u57QQjrLrzMCUkSzoo0E9wc6S8 zVNvEkoDWUluKHhgaYBg8BqrbZiVWNBWUh2TLvqznIXJOckolA9c6QSaAArZZHhkfy47FsPyV/E66 AKhCJVymchEyCBFlSh5A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qqTd2-00F58C-2d; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:27:36 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qqTcz-00F57C-1H for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:27:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB83BB81F6A; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDCA8C433C8; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 07:27:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697009251; bh=03aSR9vRMyR6WZ4IDbMq/8rQA70nwzn1OKbYDhAxn34=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AHixd93NgnbD0YCJeZq2fcEy2ebK/TS8VICXgDNmLSzi5dRPe8UA8+cWwHCtnMaHW vMJBZjhZYK1KqZpV3P9DUn1ZnKUtuBokHyk1imkMlPPDwY655vi50wGWoiaHVFwluC 55PCrbs7BT+kk6x7LSnkN3PGlPA7pcGHi3qETw3TDTnlPo1ojFdlh30pInNNP5fPGq 6udcrSx+IGBvGZX7i6JiSFr02rTol2qEu4MLbcKvis8LH+H4oqwiKqyk+7z+/FG+5v rJ3/twlRbCQNR4KwAzvAEYJLsV3gZczzKCPn/MM8yvlSy+rIb4BrGR4DnzmuGgzm20 vOpSrMbBTc3yw== From: Kalle Valo To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] wireless: move obsolete drivers to staging References: <20231010155444.858483-1-arnd@kernel.org> <2023101051-unmasked-cleaver-79b3@gregkh> <87y1g94szz.fsf@kernel.org> <2023101139-pyromania-game-2237@gregkh> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:29:58 +0300 In-Reply-To: <2023101139-pyromania-game-2237@gregkh> (Greg Kroah-Hartman's message of "Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:16:38 +0200") Message-ID: <87r0m1fwg9.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231011_002733_564991_E9D38C5A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.21 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Alexandre Belloni , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Claudiu Beznea , Pavel Machek , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Larry Finger Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 08:40:00AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> We (the wireless folks) have been talking about dropping legacy drivers >> on and off for several years now. The problem is that we don't know >> which of them work and which not, for example IIRC someone reported >> recently that wl3501 still works. >> >> Personally I would be extremly happy to remove all the ancient drivers >> as that reduces the amount of code for us to maintain but is that the >> right thing to do for the users? I don't have an answer to that, >> comments very welcome. >> >> I have been also wondering if I should add warnings like this to every >> ancient driver to see if there are any users left: >> >> "wl3501 wireless driver will be removed in 2024. If the driver still >> works and you are using it send a report NOW to >> linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org to avoid the removal." >> >> But with the long release cycles the kernel and distros have I doubt >> waiting for a year is enough, it should be more like three years. > > No matter what the time frame is, it's never going to line up with all > distros, or catch everyone properly. Yeah, that's true. > I recommend, just delete all the ones you feel are not being used, in a > patch that removes them one-by-one, so that it is trivial to revert if > someone shows up and says "hey, my device stopped working!" a few years > in the future. I'm starting to lean towards this as well. We have talked about this for so long now but no practical solution ever found so maybe just bite the bullet finally. What do others think? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel