From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp)) Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:26:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv3] support PMIC mc13892 In-Reply-To: <20101208100138.GB16418@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (Mark Brown's message of "Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:01:38 +0000") References: <1291778460-22819-1-git-send-email-yong.shen@freescale.com> <1291778460-22819-2-git-send-email-yong.shen@freescale.com> <20101208091226.GD18244@pengutronix.de> <20101208100138.GB16418@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Message-ID: <87r5dsl4s7.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Mark Brown writes: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:12:26AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > Please cut unneded context - it makes it much easier to find the new > text in your replies! > >> > + if (ret) >> > + goto err_alloc; > >> err_alloc seems wrong. The goto is taken when reading the revision >> register fails, not on a failed allocation. > > His code is following the style of naming the exit points after what > needs to be unwound rather than after the place jumped from which is > common enough? > >> > +#define MC13892_PWGT1SPI 21 >> > +#define MC13892_PWGT2SPI 22 >> > +#define MC13892_VCOINCELL 23 > >> I thought you wanted to put these somewhere below drivers/regulator/. > > Please. If we move this header into drivers/regulator, how are we supposed to declared regulators in the machine file ? The regulator code does: priv->regulators[i] = regulator_register( &mc13892_regulators[init_data->id].desc, &pdev->dev, init_data->init_data, priv); so, I'm declaring like this in the machine file: static struct mc13xxx_regulator_init_data mx51_efikamx_regulators[] = { { .id = MC13892_SW1, .init_data = &sw1_init }, { .id = MC13892_SW2, .init_data = &sw2_init }, I'm stupid enough to think that .id should match in the machine file and in the regulator driver. Did I miss something ? Arnaud