public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Fix inconsistency in irq tracking on NMIs
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:24:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tt3xmc4d.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625120823.60600-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jun 25 2025 at 14:08, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> The irq_enable/irq_disable tracepoints fire only when there's an actual
> transition (enabled->disabled and vice versa), this needs special care

vice versa). This needs ...

> in NMIs, as they can potentially start with interrupts already disabled.
> The current implementation takes care of this by tracking the lockdep
> state on nmi_entry as well as using the variable tracing_irq_cpu to
> synchronise with other calls (e.g. local_irq_disable/enable).
>
> This can be racy in case of NMIs when lockdep is enabled, and can lead
> to missing events when lockdep is disabled.
>
> Remove dependency on the lockdep status in the NMI common entry/exit
> code and adapt the tracing code to make sure that:
>
> - The first call disabling interrupts fires the tracepoint
> - The first non-NMI call enabling interrupts fires the tracepoint
> - The last NMI call enabling interrupts fires the tracepoint unless
>   interrupts were disabled before the NMI
> - All other calls don't fire

Please mention, that you fix the same problem in the ARM64 specific variant.

> Fixes: ba1f2b2eaa2a ("x86/entry: Fix NMI vs IRQ state tracking")
> Fixes: f0cd5ac1e4c5 ("arm64: entry: fix NMI {user, kernel}->kernel transitions")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> The inconsistency is visible with the sncid RV monitor and particularly
> likely on machines with the following setup:
> - x86 bare-metal with 40+ CPUs
> - tuned throughput-performance (activating regular perf NMIs)
> - workload: stress-ng --cpu-sched 21 --timer 11 --signal 11
>
> The presence of the RV monitor is useful to see the error but it is not
> necessary to trigger it.
>
> Changes since V1:
> * Reworded confusing changelog
> * Remove dependency on lockdep counters for tracepoints
> * Ensure we don't drop valid tracepoints
> * Extend change to arm64 code
>
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c |  5 ++---
>  kernel/entry/common.c            |  5 ++---
>  kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c  | 12 +++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index 7c1970b341b8c..7f1844123642e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -213,10 +213,9 @@ static void noinstr arm64_exit_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	bool restore = regs->lockdep_hardirqs;
>  
>  	ftrace_nmi_exit();
> -	if (restore) {
> -		trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> +	trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> +	if (restore)
>  		lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> -	}
>  
>  	ct_nmi_exit();
>  	lockdep_hardirq_exit();
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index a8dd1f27417cf..e234f264fb495 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -343,10 +343,9 @@ void noinstr irqentry_nmi_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, irqentry_state_t irq_state)
>  {
>  	instrumentation_begin();
>  	ftrace_nmi_exit();
> -	if (irq_state.lockdep) {
> -		trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> +	trace_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> +	if (irq_state.lockdep)
>  		lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare();
> -	}
>  	instrumentation_end();
>  
>  	ct_nmi_exit();
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> index 0c42b15c38004..fa45474fc54f1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,11 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, tracing_irq_cpu);
>   */
>  void trace_hardirqs_on_prepare(void)
>  {
> -	if (this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu)) {
> +	int tracing_count = this_cpu_read(tracing_irq_cpu);
> +
> +	if (in_nmi() && tracing_count > 1)
> +		this_cpu_dec(tracing_irq_cpu);

This if clause wants curly brackets and please add a comment explaining
this in_nmi() magic. Two month down the road everyone forgot including
you :)

Thanks,

        tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-30 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25 12:08 [PATCH v2] tracing: Fix inconsistency in irq tracking on NMIs Gabriele Monaco
2025-06-30 16:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-07-01 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-02  7:18   ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-02  9:39     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tt3xmc4d.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox