From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54A5C47258 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:45:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LQG1/w6hnuBDAyLPv2uD+WxMl0lljseFNtdoOotPbVo=; b=ErjDf0cf41rbcO IybV6y3RWcluvspOnJAF2rbVYM8Xn8MSg3aPqrm5wkvTD/psqzf2lJ0rxh0HtGR651Rxd1OhrikgX WG2Pk5Am/uqADLp97bvrFOrI3ZUhd6ko6YgRufuGJrZgngeXmskBn+6UWBu7Rw+X2A4Ge8dfx2PhN bdahNwlZ4i5bw5xaXXp8anBn1JVyrcDRwluQFPGxsPXVlGBYvVM4SEUrBlTRTGLN0Hs6az0o7f+Dj tSJ3LyPkxPePq1xq1CC8O88gbemPe2xlpchLhTCwy7goXBm8XIwcIIwmgBeobC0mwuknJEy4v82xi MT0RNrff26DpHFIGn0rg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rSBTF-00FQoa-23; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:45:21 +0000 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rSBTC-00FQnc-0y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:45:20 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSBT2-0002Jp-1r; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:45:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=PeGrflTJjw9tp7NkPQZVRHpEGXG8qAQ0CtAN1+Exswg=; b=qjObFO0PtsJ8h9C+e/R6 GHMXSONNuwwrprKA57kz8NrOMMUc4bZ+KF+f4KnJTC8VIFbB+bImOBHZ31MDOIZo7UptHZk5goweY +WXjwZYaHBIJflhtLmwH8+zNVwu0pAyQDKiVdme8rj8oCu8isFB2NiZcQ0O9btNJgBLSMuQsXaWTj NvJFOSCYPbraTCVYpXZs44jalcV1YZmQeKMyD+gGjgtT+oMTLPtukXNRVlCcrcYVHZWSDf8uTU4AD pLxahombGLBvqDyi4TdQkDzYPC0/Yn4xWph+i43C2+CuYD3uRZiDI9xw8a6oUF+046/ik7w3YyQc+ o/AoriYqDj+C0g==; From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Wadim Egorov Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Li Yang , Primoz Fiser , Stefan Wahren , Christoph Stoidner , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support In-Reply-To: <537266fe-0bf7-4208-a9f3-ae27f462c6ed@phytec.de> (Wadim Egorov's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:11:27 +0100") References: <20240122095306.14084-1-othacehe@gnu.org> <20240122095306.14084-4-othacehe@gnu.org> <537266fe-0bf7-4208-a9f3-ae27f462c6ed@phytec.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 08:44:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87ttn45w94.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240122_234518_460533_CA953C3A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hey Wadim, > You are doing more than you describing in your changes log. > Here you are forcing a gpio-only functionality for the X16 header. But the > pins we route down to the X16 expansion connector can be also used > differently. > Typically we provide device tree overlays for different use cases on this > expansion connectors. Adding those GPIOs on X16 was a suggestion from Stefan back in v3. I must say that it is quite convenient as a user to be able to interact with gpiolib on some GPIOs on the eval board. Would it be a possibility to change the muxing of those two pins in the overlays if the need arises? > Maybe this comment was lost, but I asked to move the dts-v1 tag into the > carrier board device tree. Missed that, sorry. Thanks, Mathieu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel