From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ED0C433E0 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33C1920714 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="gXQAzGGl"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="0F5Yqp1j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 33C1920714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From:References:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2f1tAOYQTuGa0WjYdLlBeZaEthsAhYkVLZD08FXaQ1Q=; b=gXQAzGGlemOiD0QXe7jMTlGsV NqxpHz82BXLR7RCDoJeo3GjnjeNg7a8SYKWpzo6JmIiFTwK9uOm0pM5ANg7+MUszeMHnUhxW/SRS8 BGV9VjmPH8JxTVXfsMgydwpPHdNNabr49IUZFzf1EotZ0enWjsZXvQ9GRRdc70AWvXnzOLSlfi87g WyqOMnNIcrIRhUV1micYWGnqcquoabQ1rqYrbEfyHi1JGtrl8A8ZTS4MiyaC5yAh8iaX4cSobpXRZ GtI2HMKi8vYcAyQK5MwWAyAIZJ7wEo6GQK5Qcpw66UA/Z7SJr6NGWKXhqb4QM4BGFNSQ/wzQXQa/f OPXTELlvA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k0KQG-0007Mm-0Y; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:16 +0000 Received: from esa4.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k0KQ9-0007KL-Qr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:53:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1595922789; x=1627458789; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=NCgo8E7J6iYnLWIERMFlSYi/bk1Up+lw+01foO6NU20=; b=0F5Yqp1jAklmivz/vNCKssuAbulqG7Z5+ZwT++553FjkVKlxRM42VvRv 2mETpFRaT4jG0Wmf9czmkdqraMszBj++BkvpzOMNVBffvKUi0hRZB/Vw5 +Ylonkwc8mpHCBm3oRM4UVMCK7fGrJ5Zl89piusxqFIy7w2TF48YinAGD zD4PxeZih6pRGUNqJByh1hJIQ5VzOmOkpwbZyzxjvIx+Iali3Nx+3mJWe NSpunRhOblc0SZPdfTD2TDZ/dJPSjoVjubPigmMyFcaBxX7D4n7BtjTX+ 9ZlVVTx/GM4iYF5ws/NqUpD+aA/gtGEkKp3lN0Ap+zUqJfEoBwuEjbncx g==; IronPort-SDR: 9hMqYVRNZCWWZDVzdqyMhx4ASsF6C1zwZ4sXT7yVaHqmywv54cblCX2voGCnD8re13oAqJ08Ed LiY1z0hRApHXgpfJew1Imemb3AzvreYokpHkAbR+VKhgeqeBtaV3C5kuc5G0KHQu0yWvuNHdnz EvmDv0100X8MnhDXlC8zs6CDB041m+WlxaSlKlEORLzuKjDjB2wwKEKWrcHBEYw5+91RnnIUV4 70ftEbXs/ahrXIFMInHaq40lA6jaRgh5c8jnDTQWMlXeArIlfL0tphuPza7XGjCXyix3M6ulN0 SqA= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,405,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="81493886" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 28 Jul 2020 00:53:08 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:52:21 -0700 Received: from soft-dev15.microsemi.net.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 00:53:06 -0700 References: <20200727112236.8199-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com> <159587873833.1360974.11729154337431621644@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <159588781925.1360974.3928941757935200801@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> From: Lars Povlsen To: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] clk: sparx5: Review changes In-Reply-To: <159588781925.1360974.3928941757935200801@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:53:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuxsf53z.fsf@soft-dev15.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200728_035310_041341_60715659 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.04 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Arnd Bergmann , Steen Hegelund , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Microchip Linux Driver Support , SoC Team , Linux ARM , linux-clk , Lars Povlsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Stephen Boyd writes: > Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2020-07-27 13:11:49) >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > >> > Why was the clk driver merged to linux-next outside of the clk tree? Was >> > there some sort of dependency? >> >> I merged the entire series of the base platform support along with >> a few core drivers. I had asked for the series to be submitted to >> soc@kernel.org after all parts had been reviewed, but I missed that >> the clk driver was still missing maintainer review (I saw you had >> reviewed some patches, but apparently that was just the binding, >> not the driver). >> >> I rebased the 'arm/newsoc' branch the other day to fix another mistake, >> so if you prefer, I can rebase it again and drop the clk driver or >> all the sparx5 patches. >> > > Yes, please just drop the clk driver and I can pick it up for the next > merge window from the list and all the fixes can be rolled into one > patch. Sorry for all the commotion! With Stephen's comments I assume I don't have to submit anything new, at least not right now. Otherwise, please let me know. Cheers, -- Lars Povlsen, Microchip _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel