From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp)) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:08:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2 3/9] ARM: kirkwood: remove support for legacy booting of Guruplug In-Reply-To: <20130802124932.GX5882@titan.lakedaemon.net> (Jason Cooper's message of "Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:49:32 -0400") References: <1375369655-1310-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1375369655-1310-4-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130802124932.GX5882@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <87txj8tf2v.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Jason Cooper writes: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:07:29PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> The Kirkwood Guruplug platform has already been converted to the >> Device Tree, so we can remove the legacy booting option for this >> platform. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/Kconfig | 7 -- >> arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/Makefile | 1 - >> arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/guruplug-setup.c | 133 -------------------------------- >> 3 files changed, 141 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/guruplug-setup.c >> > ... >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/guruplug-setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/guruplug-setup.c > ... >> -static struct mv_sata_platform_data guruplug_sata_data = { >> - .n_ports = 1, >> -}; > > This just caught my eye. iirc, there were two flavors of the Guruplug, > the Guruplug, and the Guruplug Server Plus (had eSATA plus something > else). the difference between the guruplug server and the server plus is that there's one extra ethernet port and a eSATA port on server plus (iirc, there's also the guruplug display but it's a very different beast) Arnaud