* [PATCH v4 01/16] dt-bindings: mtd: sunxi: Add H616 compatible
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:34 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Remove superfluous register readings Richard Genoud
` (16 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud, Conor Dooley
The H616 NAND controller is quite different from the A10 and A23 ones,
some registers offset changed, and some new one are introduced.
Also, the DMA handling is different (it uses chained descriptors)
So, introduce a new compatible to represent this version of the IP.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
.../mtd/allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand.yaml | 41 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand.yaml
index 054b6b8bf9b9..9d061e2216cb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand.yaml
@@ -6,9 +6,6 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
title: Allwinner A10 NAND Controller
-allOf:
- - $ref: nand-controller.yaml
-
maintainers:
- Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
- Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
@@ -18,6 +15,8 @@ properties:
enum:
- allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand
- allwinner,sun8i-a23-nand-controller
+ - allwinner,sun50i-h616-nand-controller
+
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -25,14 +24,20 @@ properties:
maxItems: 1
clocks:
+ minItems: 2
items:
- description: Bus Clock
- description: Module Clock
+ - description: ECC Clock
+ - description: MBus Clock
clock-names:
+ minItems: 2
items:
- const: ahb
- const: mod
+ - const: ecc
+ - const: mbus
resets:
maxItems: 1
@@ -85,6 +90,36 @@ required:
unevaluatedProperties: false
+allOf:
+ - $ref: nand-controller.yaml
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand
+ - allwinner,sun8i-a23-nand-controller
+ then:
+ properties:
+ clocks:
+ maxItems: 2
+ clock-names:
+ maxItems: 2
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - allwinner,sun50i-h616-nand-controller
+ then:
+ properties:
+ clocks:
+ minItems: 4
+ clock-names:
+ minItems: 4
+
examples:
- |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 02/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Remove superfluous register readings
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] dt-bindings: mtd: sunxi: Add H616 compatible Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:34 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Replace hard coded value by a define Richard Genoud
` (15 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The register NFC_REG_ECC_CTL was read twice and the result was not used,
then a third time with a mask applied.
Removing those calls didn't change the behavior.
Tested on H616 SoC, scrambling enabled.
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index f6a8e8ae819d..cb12179b63a5 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -623,13 +623,12 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_randomizer_config(struct nand_chip *nand, int page,
bool ecc)
{
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
- u32 ecc_ctl = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL);
+ u32 ecc_ctl;
u16 state;
if (!(nand->options & NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING))
return;
- ecc_ctl = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL);
state = sunxi_nfc_randomizer_state(nand, page, ecc);
ecc_ctl = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL) & ~NFC_RANDOM_SEED_MSK;
writel(ecc_ctl | NFC_RANDOM_SEED(state), nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 03/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Replace hard coded value by a define
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] dt-bindings: mtd: sunxi: Add H616 compatible Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Remove superfluous register readings Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:34 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:34 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: move ECC strenghts in sunxi_nfc_caps Richard Genoud
` (14 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The user data length (4) used all over the code hard coded.
And sometimes, it's not that trivial to know that it's the user data
length and not something else.
Moreover, for the H6/H616 this value is no more fixed by hardware, but
could be modified.
Using a define here makes the code more readable.
Suggested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index cb12179b63a5..f24e8d2083f8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -157,6 +157,17 @@
#define NFC_MAX_CS 7
+/*
+ * On A10/A23, this is the size of the NDFC User Data Register, containing the
+ * mandatory user data bytes following the ECC for each ECC step.
+ * Thus, for each ECC step, we need the ECC bytes + USER_DATA_SZ.
+ * Those bits are currently unsused, and kept as default value 0xffffffff.
+ *
+ * On H6/H616, this size became configurable, from 0 bytes to 32, via the
+ * USER_DATA_LEN registers.
+ */
+#define USER_DATA_SZ 4
+
/**
* struct sunxi_nand_chip_sel - stores information related to NAND Chip Select
*
@@ -729,7 +740,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_set_prot_oob_bytes(struct nand_chip *nand,
bool bbm, int page)
{
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
- u8 user_data[4];
+ u8 user_data[USER_DATA_SZ];
/* Randomize the Bad Block Marker. */
if (bbm && (nand->options & NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING)) {
@@ -781,7 +792,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
memset(data, pattern, ecc->size);
if (oob)
- memset(oob, pattern, ecc->bytes + 4);
+ memset(oob, pattern, ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
return 0;
}
@@ -826,7 +837,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
if (ret)
return ret;
- *cur_off = oob_off + ecc->bytes + 4;
+ *cur_off = oob_off + ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ;
ret = sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(nand, data, oob_required ? oob : NULL, 0,
readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ST),
@@ -846,11 +857,11 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
memcpy_fromio(data, nfc->regs + NFC_RAM0_BASE,
ecc->size);
- nand_change_read_column_op(nand, oob_off, oob, ecc->bytes + 4,
- false);
+ nand_change_read_column_op(nand, oob_off, oob,
+ ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ, false);
- ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(data, ecc->size,
- oob, ecc->bytes + 4,
+ ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(data, ecc->size, oob,
+ ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ,
NULL, 0, ecc->strength);
if (ret >= 0)
raw_mode = 1;
@@ -860,7 +871,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
if (oob_required) {
nand_change_read_column_op(nand, oob_off, NULL, 0,
false);
- sunxi_nfc_randomizer_read_buf(nand, oob, ecc->bytes + 4,
+ sunxi_nfc_randomizer_read_buf(nand, oob, ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ,
true, page);
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_get_prot_oob_bytes(nand, oob, 0,
@@ -954,7 +965,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
for (i = 0; i < nchunks; i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
- int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
u8 *data = buf + data_off;
u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + oob_off;
bool erased;
@@ -971,7 +982,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
/* TODO: use DMA to retrieve OOB */
nand_change_read_column_op(nand,
mtd->writesize + oob_off,
- oob, ecc->bytes + 4, false);
+ oob, ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ, false);
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_get_prot_oob_bytes(nand, oob, i,
!i, page);
@@ -986,7 +997,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
if (status & NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK) {
for (i = 0; i < nchunks; i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
- int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
u8 *data = buf + data_off;
u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + oob_off;
@@ -1006,10 +1017,10 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
/* TODO: use DMA to retrieve OOB */
nand_change_read_column_op(nand,
mtd->writesize + oob_off,
- oob, ecc->bytes + 4, false);
+ oob, ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ, false);
- ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(data, ecc->size,
- oob, ecc->bytes + 4,
+ ret = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(data, ecc->size, oob,
+ ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ,
NULL, 0,
ecc->strength);
if (ret >= 0)
@@ -1062,7 +1073,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
if (ret)
return ret;
- *cur_off = oob_off + ecc->bytes + 4;
+ *cur_off = oob_off + ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ;
return 0;
}
@@ -1073,7 +1084,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_extra_oob(struct nand_chip *nand,
{
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(nand);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &nand->ecc;
- int offset = ((ecc->bytes + 4) * ecc->steps);
+ int offset = ((ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ) * ecc->steps);
int len = mtd->oobsize - offset;
if (len <= 0)
@@ -1106,7 +1117,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_page(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf,
for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
- int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
u8 *data = buf + data_off;
u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + oob_off;
@@ -1165,7 +1176,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_subpage(struct nand_chip *nand,
for (i = data_offs / ecc->size;
i < DIV_ROUND_UP(data_offs + readlen, ecc->size); i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
- int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
u8 *data = bufpoi + data_off;
u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + oob_off;
@@ -1219,7 +1230,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_page(struct nand_chip *nand,
for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
- int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
const u8 *data = buf + data_off;
const u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + oob_off;
@@ -1257,7 +1268,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_subpage(struct nand_chip *nand,
for (i = data_offs / ecc->size;
i < DIV_ROUND_UP(data_offs + data_len, ecc->size); i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
- int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
const u8 *data = buf + data_off;
const u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + oob_off;
@@ -1296,7 +1307,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_page_dma(struct nand_chip *nand,
goto pio_fallback;
for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
- const u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + (i * (ecc->bytes + 4));
+ const u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + (i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ));
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_set_prot_oob_bytes(nand, oob, i, !i, page);
}
@@ -1566,7 +1577,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
if (section >= ecc->steps)
return -ERANGE;
- oobregion->offset = section * (ecc->bytes + 4) + 4;
+ oobregion->offset = section * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ) + 4;
oobregion->length = ecc->bytes;
return 0;
@@ -1600,10 +1611,10 @@ static int sunxi_nand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
if (section == ecc->steps && ecc->engine_type == NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_ON_HOST)
return -ERANGE;
- oobregion->offset = section * (ecc->bytes + 4);
+ oobregion->offset = section * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
if (section < ecc->steps)
- oobregion->length = 4;
+ oobregion->length = USER_DATA_SZ;
else
oobregion->length = mtd->oobsize - oobregion->offset;
@@ -1637,7 +1648,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
bytes = (mtd->oobsize - 2) / nsectors;
/* 4 non-ECC bytes are added before each ECC bytes section */
- bytes -= 4;
+ bytes -= USER_DATA_SZ;
/* and bytes has to be even. */
if (bytes % 2)
@@ -1690,7 +1701,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
nsectors = mtd->writesize / ecc->size;
- if (mtd->oobsize < ((ecc->bytes + 4) * nsectors))
+ if (mtd->oobsize < ((ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ) * nsectors))
return -EINVAL;
ecc->read_oob = sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_oob;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 03/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Replace hard coded value by a define
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Replace hard coded value by a define Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:34 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:34:56 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The user data length (4) used all over the code hard coded.
> And sometimes, it's not that trivial to know that it's the user data
> length and not something else.
> Moreover, for the H6/H616 this value is no more fixed by hardware, but
> could be modified.
>
> Using a define here makes the code more readable.
>
> Suggested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 04/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: move ECC strenghts in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Replace hard coded value by a define Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:34 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_ecc_err_cnt " Richard Genoud
` (13 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
H6/H616 has more ECC strenghts than A10/A23.
Move the ECC strenghts array to sunxi_nfc_caps to make it ready for
H6/H616 support.
No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index f24e8d2083f8..89115a8f0718 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -224,11 +224,15 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* through MBUS on A23/A33 needs extra configuration.
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
+ * @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
+ * @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
*/
struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
+ const u8 *ecc_strengths;
+ unsigned int nstrengths;
};
/**
@@ -1630,9 +1634,9 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc,
struct device_node *np)
{
- static const u8 strengths[] = { 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64 };
struct sunxi_nand_chip *sunxi_nand = to_sunxi_nand(nand);
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
+ const u8 *strengths = nfc->caps->ecc_strengths;
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(nand);
struct nand_device *nanddev = mtd_to_nanddev(mtd);
int nsectors;
@@ -1656,7 +1660,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
ecc->strength = bytes * 8 / fls(8 * ecc->size);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(strengths); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nfc->caps->nstrengths; i++) {
if (strengths[i] > ecc->strength)
break;
}
@@ -1677,7 +1681,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
}
/* Add ECC info retrieval from DT */
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(strengths); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nfc->caps->nstrengths; i++) {
if (ecc->strength <= strengths[i]) {
/*
* Update ecc->strength value with the actual strength
@@ -1688,7 +1692,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
}
}
- if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(strengths)) {
+ if (i >= nfc->caps->nstrengths) {
dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported strength\n");
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
@@ -2178,15 +2182,23 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
dma_release_channel(nfc->dmac);
}
+static const u8 sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10[] = {
+ 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64
+};
+
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
.dma_maxburst = 4,
+ .ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
+ .nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
};
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.has_mdma = true,
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
.dma_maxburst = 8,
+ .ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
+ .nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
};
static const struct of_device_id sunxi_nfc_ids[] = {
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 05/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_ecc_err_cnt in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: move ECC strenghts in sunxi_nfc_caps Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:34 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:36 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data " Richard Genoud
` (12 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 ECC_ERR_CNT register is not at the same offset as the
A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 89115a8f0718..d877c20c203d 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@
#define NFC_REG_ECC_CTL 0x0034
#define NFC_REG_ECC_ST 0x0038
#define NFC_REG_DEBUG 0x003C
-#define NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(x) ((0x0040 + (x)) & ~0x3)
+#define NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT 0x0040
+#define NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(nfc, x) ((nfc->caps->reg_ecc_err_cnt + (x)) & ~0x3)
#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(x) (0x0050 + ((x) * 4))
#define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA 0x00A0
#define NFC_REG_PAT_ID 0x00A4
@@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @has_mdma: Use mbus dma mode, otherwise general dma
* through MBUS on A23/A33 needs extra configuration.
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
+ * @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
* @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
@@ -230,6 +232,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
unsigned int reg_io_data;
+ unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
unsigned int nstrengths;
@@ -801,7 +804,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
return 0;
}
- tmp = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(step));
+ tmp = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(nfc, step));
return NFC_ECC_ERR_CNT(step, tmp);
}
@@ -2188,6 +2191,7 @@ static const u8 sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10[] = {
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
+ .reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
@@ -2196,6 +2200,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.has_mdma = true,
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
+ .reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_ecc_err_cnt in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_ecc_err_cnt " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:36 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:34:58 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The H6/H616 ECC_ERR_CNT register is not at the same offset as the
> A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 06/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_ecc_err_cnt " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:34 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:37 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers Richard Genoud
` (11 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 USER_DATA register is not at the same offset as the
A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index d877c20c203d..89495d786293 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -48,7 +48,8 @@
#define NFC_REG_DEBUG 0x003C
#define NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT 0x0040
#define NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(nfc, x) ((nfc->caps->reg_ecc_err_cnt + (x)) & ~0x3)
-#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(x) (0x0050 + ((x) * 4))
+#define NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA 0x0050
+#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, x) (nfc->caps->reg_user_data + ((x) * 4))
#define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA 0x00A0
#define NFC_REG_PAT_ID 0x00A4
#define NFC_REG_MDMA_ADDR 0x00C0
@@ -225,6 +226,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* through MBUS on A23/A33 needs extra configuration.
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
+ * @reg_user_data: User data register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
* @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
@@ -233,6 +235,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
+ unsigned int reg_user_data;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
unsigned int nstrengths;
@@ -734,8 +737,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_get_prot_oob_bytes(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob,
{
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
- sunxi_nfc_user_data_to_buf(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA(step)),
- oob);
+ sunxi_nfc_user_data_to_buf(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, step)), oob);
/* De-randomize the Bad Block Marker. */
if (bbm && (nand->options & NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING))
@@ -757,7 +759,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_set_prot_oob_bytes(struct nand_chip *nand,
}
writel(sunxi_nfc_buf_to_user_data(oob),
- nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA(step));
+ nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, step));
}
static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_update_stats(struct nand_chip *nand,
@@ -2192,6 +2194,7 @@ static const u8 sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10[] = {
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
+ .reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
@@ -2201,6 +2204,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.has_mdma = true,
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
+ .reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 06/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:37 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:34:59 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The H6/H616 USER_DATA register is not at the same offset as the
> A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:41 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: add has_ecc_block_512 capability Richard Genoud
` (10 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
On H6/H616, the register ECC_PAT_FOUND is at its own address, and not
part of ECC status register.
So, introduce the pattern found register offset in sunxi_nfc_caps, along
with its mask.
Also, introduce a non compile-time field_get() because FIELD_GET() and
u32_get_bits() don't work with non compile-time constant.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1761588465.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 89495d786293..021034a761b7 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/reset.h>
+/* non compile-time field get */
+#define field_get(_mask, _reg) (((_reg) & (_mask)) >> (ffs(_mask) - 1))
+
#define NFC_REG_CTL 0x0000
#define NFC_REG_ST 0x0004
#define NFC_REG_INT 0x0008
@@ -150,7 +153,13 @@
/* define bit use in NFC_ECC_ST */
#define NFC_ECC_ERR(x) BIT(x)
#define NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK GENMASK(15, 0)
-#define NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND(x) BIT(x + 16)
+
+/*
+ * define bit use in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND
+ * For A10/A23, NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND == NFC_ECC_ST register
+ */
+#define NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND_MSK(nfc) (nfc->caps->pat_found_mask)
+
#define NFC_ECC_ERR_CNT(b, x) (((x) >> (((b) % 4) * 8)) & 0xff)
#define NFC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
@@ -227,6 +236,8 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
+ * @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
+ * @pat_found_mask: ECC_PAT_FOUND mask in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
* @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
@@ -236,6 +247,8 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
+ unsigned int reg_pat_found;
+ unsigned int pat_found_mask;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
unsigned int nstrengths;
@@ -776,7 +789,8 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_update_stats(struct nand_chip *nand,
}
static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
- int step, u32 status, bool *erased)
+ int step, u32 status, u32 pattern_found,
+ bool *erased)
{
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &nand->ecc;
@@ -787,7 +801,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
if (status & NFC_ECC_ERR(step))
return -EBADMSG;
- if (status & NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND(step)) {
+ if (pattern_found & BIT(step)) {
u8 pattern;
if (unlikely(!(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_PAT_ID) & 0x1))) {
@@ -821,6 +835,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &nand->ecc;
int raw_mode = 0;
+ u32 pattern_found;
bool erased;
int ret;
@@ -848,8 +863,12 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
*cur_off = oob_off + ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ;
+ pattern_found = readl(nfc->regs + nfc->caps->reg_pat_found);
+ pattern_found = field_get(NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND_MSK(nfc), pattern_found);
+
ret = sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(nand, data, oob_required ? oob : NULL, 0,
readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ST),
+ pattern_found,
&erased);
if (erased)
return 1;
@@ -930,7 +949,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
int ret, i, raw_mode = 0;
struct scatterlist sg;
- u32 status, wait;
+ u32 status, pattern_found, wait;
ret = sunxi_nfc_wait_cmd_fifo_empty(nfc);
if (ret)
@@ -971,6 +990,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
return ret;
status = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ST);
+ pattern_found = readl(nfc->regs + nfc->caps->reg_pat_found);
+ pattern_found = field_get(NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND_MSK(nfc), pattern_found);
for (i = 0; i < nchunks; i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
@@ -981,7 +1002,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
ret = sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(nand, randomized ? data : NULL,
oob_required ? oob : NULL,
- i, status, &erased);
+ i, status, pattern_found,
+ &erased);
/* ECC errors are handled in the second loop. */
if (ret < 0)
@@ -2195,6 +2217,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
+ .pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
@@ -2205,6 +2229,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
+ .pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:41 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 16:20 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:35:00 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> On H6/H616, the register ECC_PAT_FOUND is at its own address, and not
> part of ECC status register.
> So, introduce the pattern found register offset in sunxi_nfc_caps, along
> with its mask.
>
> Also, introduce a non compile-time field_get() because FIELD_GET() and
> u32_get_bits() don't work with non compile-time constant.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1761588465.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Urls should use Link: tag and be placed at the bottom.
Code itself looks fine.
Best regards,
Jernej
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> index 89495d786293..021034a761b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> +/* non compile-time field get */
> +#define field_get(_mask, _reg) (((_reg) & (_mask)) >> (ffs(_mask) - 1))
> +
> #define NFC_REG_CTL 0x0000
> #define NFC_REG_ST 0x0004
> #define NFC_REG_INT 0x0008
> @@ -150,7 +153,13 @@
> /* define bit use in NFC_ECC_ST */
> #define NFC_ECC_ERR(x) BIT(x)
> #define NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK GENMASK(15, 0)
> -#define NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND(x) BIT(x + 16)
> +
> +/*
> + * define bit use in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND
> + * For A10/A23, NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND == NFC_ECC_ST register
> + */
> +#define NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND_MSK(nfc) (nfc->caps->pat_found_mask)
> +
> #define NFC_ECC_ERR_CNT(b, x) (((x) >> (((b) % 4) * 8)) & 0xff)
>
> #define NFC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
> @@ -227,6 +236,8 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
> * @reg_io_data: I/O data register
> * @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
> * @reg_user_data: User data register
> + * @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
> + * @pat_found_mask: ECC_PAT_FOUND mask in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND register
> * @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
> * @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
> * @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
> @@ -236,6 +247,8 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
> unsigned int reg_io_data;
> unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
> unsigned int reg_user_data;
> + unsigned int reg_pat_found;
> + unsigned int pat_found_mask;
> unsigned int dma_maxburst;
> const u8 *ecc_strengths;
> unsigned int nstrengths;
> @@ -776,7 +789,8 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_update_stats(struct nand_chip *nand,
> }
>
> static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
> - int step, u32 status, bool *erased)
> + int step, u32 status, u32 pattern_found,
> + bool *erased)
> {
> struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
> struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &nand->ecc;
> @@ -787,7 +801,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
> if (status & NFC_ECC_ERR(step))
> return -EBADMSG;
>
> - if (status & NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND(step)) {
> + if (pattern_found & BIT(step)) {
> u8 pattern;
>
> if (unlikely(!(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_PAT_ID) & 0x1))) {
> @@ -821,6 +835,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
> struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(nand->controller);
> struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &nand->ecc;
> int raw_mode = 0;
> + u32 pattern_found;
> bool erased;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -848,8 +863,12 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
>
> *cur_off = oob_off + ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ;
>
> + pattern_found = readl(nfc->regs + nfc->caps->reg_pat_found);
> + pattern_found = field_get(NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND_MSK(nfc), pattern_found);
> +
> ret = sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(nand, data, oob_required ? oob : NULL, 0,
> readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ST),
> + pattern_found,
> &erased);
> if (erased)
> return 1;
> @@ -930,7 +949,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
> unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> int ret, i, raw_mode = 0;
> struct scatterlist sg;
> - u32 status, wait;
> + u32 status, pattern_found, wait;
>
> ret = sunxi_nfc_wait_cmd_fifo_empty(nfc);
> if (ret)
> @@ -971,6 +990,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
> return ret;
>
> status = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_ST);
> + pattern_found = readl(nfc->regs + nfc->caps->reg_pat_found);
> + pattern_found = field_get(NFC_ECC_PAT_FOUND_MSK(nfc), pattern_found);
>
> for (i = 0; i < nchunks; i++) {
> int data_off = i * ecc->size;
> @@ -981,7 +1002,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
>
> ret = sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(nand, randomized ? data : NULL,
> oob_required ? oob : NULL,
> - i, status, &erased);
> + i, status, pattern_found,
> + &erased);
>
> /* ECC errors are handled in the second loop. */
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -2195,6 +2217,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
> .reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
> .reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
> .reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
> + .reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
> + .pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
> .dma_maxburst = 4,
> .ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
> .nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
> @@ -2205,6 +2229,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
> .reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
> .reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
> .reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
> + .reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
> + .pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
> .dma_maxburst = 8,
> .ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
> .nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers
2025-10-28 15:41 ` Jernej Škrabec
@ 2025-10-28 16:20 ` Miquel Raynal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2025-10-28 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jernej Škrabec
Cc: Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai, Samuel Holland,
Richard Genoud, Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold,
Maxime Ripard, Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-sunxi, linux-kernel
On 28/10/2025 at 16:41:48 +01, Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:35:00 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
>> On H6/H616, the register ECC_PAT_FOUND is at its own address, and not
>> part of ECC status register.
>> So, introduce the pattern found register offset in sunxi_nfc_caps, along
>> with its mask.
>>
>> Also, introduce a non compile-time field_get() because FIELD_GET() and
>> u32_get_bits() don't work with non compile-time constant.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1761588465.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
>
> Urls should use Link: tag and be placed at the bottom.
I was about to apply, so I'll fix this while applying.
>
> Code itself looks fine.
Thanks for the review!
Miquèl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 08/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: add has_ecc_block_512 capability
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:43 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_mode_mask in sunxi_nfc_caps Richard Genoud
` (9 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H616 controller can't handle 512 bytes ECC block size. The
NFC_ECC_BLOCK_512 bit disappeared in H6, and NDFC_RANDOM_EN took its
place.
So, add has_ecc_block_512 capability to only set this bit on SoC having
it.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 021034a761b7..7976cd862b1b 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
*
* @has_mdma: Use mbus dma mode, otherwise general dma
* through MBUS on A23/A33 needs extra configuration.
+ * @has_ecc_block_512: If the ECC can handle 512B or only 1024B chuncks
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
@@ -244,6 +245,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
*/
struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
+ bool has_ecc_block_512;
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
@@ -1758,8 +1760,14 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
sunxi_nand->ecc.ecc_ctl = NFC_ECC_MODE(i) | NFC_ECC_EXCEPTION |
NFC_ECC_PIPELINE | NFC_ECC_EN;
- if (ecc->size == 512)
- sunxi_nand->ecc.ecc_ctl |= NFC_ECC_BLOCK_512;
+ if (ecc->size == 512) {
+ if (nfc->caps->has_ecc_block_512) {
+ sunxi_nand->ecc.ecc_ctl |= NFC_ECC_BLOCK_512;
+ } else {
+ dev_err(nfc->dev, "512B ECC block not supported\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -2214,6 +2222,7 @@ static const u8 sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10[] = {
};
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
+ .has_ecc_block_512 = true,
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
@@ -2226,6 +2235,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.has_mdma = true,
+ .has_ecc_block_512 = true,
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 08/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: add has_ecc_block_512 capability
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: add has_ecc_block_512 capability Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:43 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:35:01 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The H616 controller can't handle 512 bytes ECC block size. The
> NFC_ECC_BLOCK_512 bit disappeared in H6, and NDFC_RANDOM_EN took its
> place.
>
> So, add has_ecc_block_512 capability to only set this bit on SoC having
> it.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 09/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_mode_mask in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: add has_ecc_block_512 capability Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce random en/dir " Richard Genoud
` (8 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 ECC_MODE field is not at the same offset, and has not the
same size.
So move the mask into sunxi_nfc_caps.
Also, introduce a non compile-time field_prep() because FIELD_PREP()
doesn't work with non compile-time constant.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1761588465.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 7976cd862b1b..a16d50a01751 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -29,8 +29,9 @@
#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/reset.h>
-/* non compile-time field get */
+/* non compile-time field get/prep */
#define field_get(_mask, _reg) (((_reg) & (_mask)) >> (ffs(_mask) - 1))
+#define field_prep(_mask, _val) (((_val) << (ffs(_mask) - 1)) & (_mask))
#define NFC_REG_CTL 0x0000
#define NFC_REG_ST 0x0004
@@ -145,8 +146,8 @@
#define NFC_ECC_BLOCK_512 BIT(5)
#define NFC_RANDOM_EN BIT(9)
#define NFC_RANDOM_DIRECTION BIT(10)
-#define NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK GENMASK(15, 12)
-#define NFC_ECC_MODE(x) ((x) << 12)
+#define NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK(nfc) (nfc->caps->ecc_mode_mask)
+#define NFC_ECC_MODE(nfc, x) field_prep(NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK(nfc), (x))
#define NFC_RANDOM_SEED_MSK GENMASK(30, 16)
#define NFC_RANDOM_SEED(x) ((x) << 16)
@@ -238,6 +239,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
* @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
+ * @ecc_mode_mask: ECC_MODE mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
* @pat_found_mask: ECC_PAT_FOUND mask in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
@@ -250,6 +252,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
unsigned int reg_pat_found;
+ unsigned int ecc_mode_mask;
unsigned int pat_found_mask;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
@@ -1757,7 +1760,7 @@ static int sunxi_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init(struct nand_chip *nand,
ecc->read_oob_raw = nand_read_oob_std;
ecc->write_oob_raw = nand_write_oob_std;
- sunxi_nand->ecc.ecc_ctl = NFC_ECC_MODE(i) | NFC_ECC_EXCEPTION |
+ sunxi_nand->ecc.ecc_ctl = NFC_ECC_MODE(nfc, i) | NFC_ECC_EXCEPTION |
NFC_ECC_PIPELINE | NFC_ECC_EN;
if (ecc->size == 512) {
@@ -2227,6 +2230,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
+ .ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 12),
.pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
@@ -2240,6 +2244,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
+ .ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 12),
.pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 10/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce random en/dir in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_mode_mask in sunxi_nfc_caps Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_pat_id " Richard Genoud
` (7 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 RANDOM EN/DIRECTION masks are different from A10/A23.
So move the masks into sunxi_nfc_caps.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index a16d50a01751..7dfc50a788e2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -144,8 +144,8 @@
#define NFC_ECC_EXCEPTION BIT(4)
#define NFC_ECC_BLOCK_SIZE_MSK BIT(5)
#define NFC_ECC_BLOCK_512 BIT(5)
-#define NFC_RANDOM_EN BIT(9)
-#define NFC_RANDOM_DIRECTION BIT(10)
+#define NFC_RANDOM_EN(nfc) (nfc->caps->random_en_mask)
+#define NFC_RANDOM_DIRECTION(nfc) (nfc->caps->random_dir_mask)
#define NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK(nfc) (nfc->caps->ecc_mode_mask)
#define NFC_ECC_MODE(nfc, x) field_prep(NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK(nfc), (x))
#define NFC_RANDOM_SEED_MSK GENMASK(30, 16)
@@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
* @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
+ * @random_en_mask: RANDOM_EN mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
+ * @random_dir_mask: RANDOM_DIRECTION mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
* @ecc_mode_mask: ECC_MODE mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
* @pat_found_mask: ECC_PAT_FOUND mask in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
@@ -252,6 +254,8 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
unsigned int reg_pat_found;
+ unsigned int random_en_mask;
+ unsigned int random_dir_mask;
unsigned int ecc_mode_mask;
unsigned int pat_found_mask;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
@@ -680,7 +684,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_randomizer_enable(struct nand_chip *nand)
if (!(nand->options & NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING))
return;
- writel(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL) | NFC_RANDOM_EN,
+ writel(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL) | NFC_RANDOM_EN(nfc),
nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL);
}
@@ -691,7 +695,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_randomizer_disable(struct nand_chip *nand)
if (!(nand->options & NAND_NEED_SCRAMBLING))
return;
- writel(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL) & ~NFC_RANDOM_EN,
+ writel(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL) & ~NFC_RANDOM_EN(nfc),
nfc->regs + NFC_REG_ECC_CTL);
}
@@ -2230,6 +2234,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
+ .random_en_mask = BIT(9),
+ .random_dir_mask = BIT(10),
.ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 12),
.pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 4,
@@ -2244,6 +2250,8 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
+ .random_en_mask = BIT(9),
+ .random_dir_mask = BIT(10),
.ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 12),
.pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 8,
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 11/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_pat_id in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce random en/dir " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:45 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_spare_area " Richard Genoud
` (6 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 pattern ID register is not at the same offset as the
A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 7dfc50a788e2..3cb84e502ad7 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@
#define NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA 0x0050
#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, x) (nfc->caps->reg_user_data + ((x) * 4))
#define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA 0x00A0
-#define NFC_REG_PAT_ID 0x00A4
+#define NFC_REG_PAT_ID(nfc) (nfc->caps->reg_pat_id)
+#define NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID 0x00A4
#define NFC_REG_MDMA_ADDR 0x00C0
#define NFC_REG_MDMA_CNT 0x00C4
#define NFC_RAM0_BASE 0x0400
@@ -238,6 +239,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
+ * @reg_pat_id: Pattern ID Register
* @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
* @random_en_mask: RANDOM_EN mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
* @random_dir_mask: RANDOM_DIRECTION mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
@@ -253,6 +255,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
+ unsigned int reg_pat_id;
unsigned int reg_pat_found;
unsigned int random_en_mask;
unsigned int random_dir_mask;
@@ -813,7 +816,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_correct(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *data, u8 *oob,
if (pattern_found & BIT(step)) {
u8 pattern;
- if (unlikely(!(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_PAT_ID) & 0x1))) {
+ if (unlikely(!(readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_PAT_ID(nfc)) & 0x1))) {
pattern = 0x0;
} else {
pattern = 0xff;
@@ -2233,6 +2236,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_pat_id = NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
.random_en_mask = BIT(9),
.random_dir_mask = BIT(10),
@@ -2249,6 +2253,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_pat_id = NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
.random_en_mask = BIT(9),
.random_dir_mask = BIT(10),
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 11/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_pat_id in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_pat_id " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:45 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:35:04 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The H6/H616 pattern ID register is not at the same offset as the
> A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 12/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_spare_area in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_pat_id " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:45 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_err_mask " Richard Genoud
` (5 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 spare area register is not at the same offset as the
A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 3cb84e502ad7..d2e5bcb76925 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
#define NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(nfc, x) ((nfc->caps->reg_ecc_err_cnt + (x)) & ~0x3)
#define NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA 0x0050
#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, x) (nfc->caps->reg_user_data + ((x) * 4))
-#define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA 0x00A0
+#define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA(nfc) (nfc->caps->reg_spare_area)
+#define NFC_REG_A10_SPARE_AREA 0x00A0
#define NFC_REG_PAT_ID(nfc) (nfc->caps->reg_pat_id)
#define NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID 0x00A4
#define NFC_REG_MDMA_ADDR 0x00C0
@@ -239,6 +240,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
+ * @reg_spare_area: Spare Area Register
* @reg_pat_id: Pattern ID Register
* @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
* @random_en_mask: RANDOM_EN mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
@@ -255,6 +257,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
+ unsigned int reg_spare_area;
unsigned int reg_pat_id;
unsigned int reg_pat_found;
unsigned int random_en_mask;
@@ -477,7 +480,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip *nand, unsigned int cs)
if (sel->rb >= 0)
ctl |= NFC_RB_SEL(sel->rb);
- writel(mtd->writesize, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA);
+ writel(mtd->writesize, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA(nfc));
if (nfc->clk_rate != sunxi_nand->clk_rate) {
clk_set_rate(nfc->mod_clk, sunxi_nand->clk_rate);
@@ -2236,6 +2239,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_spare_area = NFC_REG_A10_SPARE_AREA,
.reg_pat_id = NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
.random_en_mask = BIT(9),
@@ -2253,6 +2257,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
.reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT,
.reg_user_data = NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_spare_area = NFC_REG_A10_SPARE_AREA,
.reg_pat_id = NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID,
.reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_ECC_ST,
.random_en_mask = BIT(9),
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 12/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_spare_area in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_spare_area " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:45 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:35:05 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The H6/H616 spare area register is not at the same offset as the
> A10/A23 one, so move its offset into sunxi_nfc_caps.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 13/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_err_mask in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_spare_area " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce sram_size " Richard Genoud
` (4 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 error mask register is bigger than the A10/A23 one, so move
its mask into sunxi_nfc_caps.
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index d2e5bcb76925..0a9ac75bb229 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
/* define bit use in NFC_ECC_ST */
#define NFC_ECC_ERR(x) BIT(x)
-#define NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK GENMASK(15, 0)
+#define NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK(nfc) (nfc->caps->ecc_err_mask)
/*
* define bit use in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @random_en_mask: RANDOM_EN mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
* @random_dir_mask: RANDOM_DIRECTION mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
* @ecc_mode_mask: ECC_MODE mask in NFC_ECC_CTL register
+ * @ecc_err_mask: NFC_ECC_ERR mask in NFC_ECC_ST register
* @pat_found_mask: ECC_PAT_FOUND mask in NFC_REG_PAT_FOUND register
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
@@ -263,6 +264,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int random_en_mask;
unsigned int random_dir_mask;
unsigned int ecc_mode_mask;
+ unsigned int ecc_err_mask;
unsigned int pat_found_mask;
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
@@ -1040,7 +1042,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_update_stats(nand, &max_bitflips, ret);
}
- if (status & NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK) {
+ if (status & NFC_ECC_ERR_MSK(nfc)) {
for (i = 0; i < nchunks; i++) {
int data_off = i * ecc->size;
int oob_off = i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ);
@@ -2245,6 +2247,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.random_en_mask = BIT(9),
.random_dir_mask = BIT(10),
.ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 12),
+ .ecc_err_mask = GENMASK(15, 0),
.pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
@@ -2263,6 +2266,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.random_en_mask = BIT(9),
.random_dir_mask = BIT(10),
.ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 12),
+ .ecc_err_mask = GENMASK(15, 0),
.pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 16),
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 14/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce sram_size in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_err_mask " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 15:46 ` Jernej Škrabec
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Add support for H616 nand controller Richard Genoud
` (3 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H6/H616 the SRAM is bigger than the A10/A23 one, so move its size
into sunxi_nfc_caps.
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 0a9ac75bb229..5e030fc2fde5 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -167,8 +167,6 @@
#define NFC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
-#define NFC_SRAM_SIZE 1024
-
#define NFC_MAX_CS 7
/*
@@ -251,6 +249,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
* @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
+ * @sram_size: Size of the NAND controller SRAM
*/
struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
@@ -269,6 +268,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
unsigned int nstrengths;
+ int sram_size;
};
/**
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_read_buf(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf, int len)
while (len > offs) {
bool poll = false;
- cnt = min(len - offs, NFC_SRAM_SIZE);
+ cnt = min(len - offs, nfc->caps->sram_size);
ret = sunxi_nfc_wait_cmd_fifo_empty(nfc);
if (ret)
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_write_buf(struct nand_chip *nand, const uint8_t *buf,
while (len > offs) {
bool poll = false;
- cnt = min(len - offs, NFC_SRAM_SIZE);
+ cnt = min(len - offs, nfc->caps->sram_size);
ret = sunxi_nfc_wait_cmd_fifo_empty(nfc);
if (ret)
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_exec_subop(struct nand_chip *nand,
case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
start = nand_subop_get_data_start_off(subop, i);
remaining = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, i);
- cnt = min_t(u32, remaining, NFC_SRAM_SIZE);
+ cnt = min_t(u32, remaining, nfc->caps->sram_size);
cmd |= NFC_DATA_TRANS | NFC_DATA_SWAP_METHOD;
if (instr->type == NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR) {
@@ -2252,6 +2252,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
+ .sram_size = 1024,
};
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
@@ -2271,6 +2272,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
+ .sram_size = 1024,
};
static const struct of_device_id sunxi_nfc_ids[] = {
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 14/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce sram_size in sunxi_nfc_caps
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce sram_size " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 15:46 ` Jernej Škrabec
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jernej Škrabec @ 2025-10-28 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
Dne torek, 28. oktober 2025 ob 08:35:07 Srednjeevropski standardni čas je Richard Genoud napisal(a):
> The H6/H616 the SRAM is bigger than the A10/A23 one, so move its size
> into sunxi_nfc_caps.
>
> No functional change
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jernej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 15/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Add support for H616 nand controller
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce sram_size " Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: add NAND controller Richard Genoud
` (2 subsequent siblings)
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H616 nand controller has the same base as A10/A23, with some
differences:
- mdma is based on chained buffers
- its ECC supports up to 80bit per 1024bytes
- some registers layouts are a bit different, mainly due do the stronger
ECC.
- it uses USER_DATA_LEN registers along USER_DATA registers.
- it needs a specific clock for ECC and MBUS.
Introduce the basic support, with ECC and scrambling, but without
DMA/MDMA.
Tested on Whatsminer H616 board (with and without scrambling, ECC)
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 5e030fc2fde5..031ab651c5a8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -49,17 +49,40 @@
#define NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA 0x0300
#define NFC_REG_ECC_CTL 0x0034
#define NFC_REG_ECC_ST 0x0038
-#define NFC_REG_DEBUG 0x003C
+#define NFC_REG_H6_PAT_FOUND 0x003C
#define NFC_REG_A10_ECC_ERR_CNT 0x0040
+#define NFC_REG_H6_ECC_ERR_CNT 0x0050
#define NFC_REG_ECC_ERR_CNT(nfc, x) ((nfc->caps->reg_ecc_err_cnt + (x)) & ~0x3)
+#define NFC_REG_H6_RDATA_CTL 0x0044
+#define NFC_REG_H6_RDATA_0 0x0048
+#define NFC_REG_H6_RDATA_1 0x004C
#define NFC_REG_A10_USER_DATA 0x0050
+#define NFC_REG_H6_USER_DATA 0x0080
#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA(nfc, x) (nfc->caps->reg_user_data + ((x) * 4))
+#define NFC_REG_H6_USER_DATA_LEN 0x0070
+/* A USER_DATA_LEN register can hold the length of 8 USER_DATA registers */
+#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN_CAPACITY 8
+#define NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN(nfc, step) \
+ (nfc->caps->reg_user_data_len + \
+ ((step) / NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN_CAPACITY) * 4)
#define NFC_REG_SPARE_AREA(nfc) (nfc->caps->reg_spare_area)
#define NFC_REG_A10_SPARE_AREA 0x00A0
#define NFC_REG_PAT_ID(nfc) (nfc->caps->reg_pat_id)
#define NFC_REG_A10_PAT_ID 0x00A4
#define NFC_REG_MDMA_ADDR 0x00C0
#define NFC_REG_MDMA_CNT 0x00C4
+#define NFC_REG_H6_EFNAND_STATUS 0x0110
+#define NFC_REG_H6_SPARE_AREA 0x0114
+#define NFC_REG_H6_PAT_ID 0x0118
+#define NFC_REG_H6_DDR2_SPEC_CTL 0x011C
+#define NFC_REG_H6_NDMA_MODE_CTL 0x0120
+#define NFC_REG_H6_MDMA_DLBA_REG 0x0200
+#define NFC_REG_H6_MDMA_STA 0x0204
+#define NFC_REG_H6_MDMA_INT_MAS 0x0208
+#define NFC_REG_H6_MDMA_DESC_ADDR 0x020C
+#define NFC_REG_H6_MDMA_BUF_ADDR 0x0210
+#define NFC_REG_H6_MDMA_CNT 0x0214
+
#define NFC_RAM0_BASE 0x0400
#define NFC_RAM1_BASE 0x0800
@@ -71,6 +94,7 @@
#define NFC_BUS_WIDTH_16 (1 << 2)
#define NFC_RB_SEL_MSK BIT(3)
#define NFC_RB_SEL(x) ((x) << 3)
+/* CE_SEL BIT 27 is meant to be used for GPIO chipselect */
#define NFC_CE_SEL_MSK GENMASK(26, 24)
#define NFC_CE_SEL(x) ((x) << 24)
#define NFC_CE_CTL BIT(6)
@@ -89,6 +113,9 @@
#define NFC_STA BIT(4)
#define NFC_NATCH_INT_FLAG BIT(5)
#define NFC_RB_STATE(x) BIT(x + 8)
+#define NFC_RB_STATE_MSK GENMASK(11, 8)
+#define NDFC_RDATA_STA_1 BIT(12)
+#define NDFC_RDATA_STA_0 BIT(13)
/* define bit use in NFC_INT */
#define NFC_B2R_INT_ENABLE BIT(0)
@@ -100,6 +127,7 @@
/* define bit use in NFC_TIMING_CTL */
#define NFC_TIMING_CTL_EDO BIT(8)
+#define NFC_TIMING_CTL_E_EDO BIT(9)
/* define NFC_TIMING_CFG register layout */
#define NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD) \
@@ -107,9 +135,15 @@
(((tWHR) & 0x3) << 4) | (((tRHW) & 0x3) << 6) | \
(((tCAD) & 0x7) << 8))
+#define NFC_TIMING_CFG2(tCDQSS, tSC, tCLHZ, tCSS, tWC) \
+ ((((tCDQSS) & 0x1) << 11) | (((tSC) & 0x3) << 12) | \
+ (((tCLHZ) & 0x3) << 14) | (((tCSS) & 0x3) << 16) | \
+ (((tWC) & 0x3) << 18))
+
/* define bit use in NFC_CMD */
#define NFC_CMD_LOW_BYTE_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
-#define NFC_CMD_HIGH_BYTE_MSK GENMASK(15, 8)
+#define NFC_CMD_HIGH_BYTE_MSK GENMASK(15, 8) /* 15-10 reserved on H6 */
+#define NFC_CMD_ADR_NUM_MSK GENMASK(9, 8)
#define NFC_CMD(x) (x)
#define NFC_ADR_NUM_MSK GENMASK(18, 16)
#define NFC_ADR_NUM(x) (((x) - 1) << 16)
@@ -122,6 +156,7 @@
#define NFC_SEQ BIT(25)
#define NFC_DATA_SWAP_METHOD BIT(26)
#define NFC_ROW_AUTO_INC BIT(27)
+#define NFC_H6_SEND_RND_CMD2 BIT(27)
#define NFC_SEND_CMD3 BIT(28)
#define NFC_SEND_CMD4 BIT(29)
#define NFC_CMD_TYPE_MSK GENMASK(31, 30)
@@ -133,6 +168,7 @@
#define NFC_READ_CMD_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
#define NFC_RND_READ_CMD0_MSK GENMASK(15, 8)
#define NFC_RND_READ_CMD1_MSK GENMASK(23, 16)
+#define NFC_RND_READ_CMD2_MSK GENMASK(31, 24)
/* define bit use in NFC_WCMD_SET */
#define NFC_PROGRAM_CMD_MSK GENMASK(7, 0)
@@ -150,6 +186,9 @@
#define NFC_RANDOM_DIRECTION(nfc) (nfc->caps->random_dir_mask)
#define NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK(nfc) (nfc->caps->ecc_mode_mask)
#define NFC_ECC_MODE(nfc, x) field_prep(NFC_ECC_MODE_MSK(nfc), (x))
+/* RANDOM_PAGE_SIZE: 0: ECC block size 1: page size */
+#define NFC_A23_RANDOM_PAGE_SIZE BIT(11)
+#define NFC_H6_RANDOM_PAGE_SIZE BIT(7)
#define NFC_RANDOM_SEED_MSK GENMASK(30, 16)
#define NFC_RANDOM_SEED(x) ((x) << 16)
@@ -165,6 +204,9 @@
#define NFC_ECC_ERR_CNT(b, x) (((x) >> (((b) % 4) * 8)) & 0xff)
+#define NFC_USER_DATA_LEN_MSK(step) \
+ (0xf << (((step) % NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN_CAPACITY) * 4))
+
#define NFC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
#define NFC_MAX_CS 7
@@ -235,9 +277,12 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @has_mdma: Use mbus dma mode, otherwise general dma
* through MBUS on A23/A33 needs extra configuration.
* @has_ecc_block_512: If the ECC can handle 512B or only 1024B chuncks
+ * @has_ecc_clk: If the controller needs an ECC clock.
+ * @has_mbus_clk: If the controller needs a mbus clock.
* @reg_io_data: I/O data register
* @reg_ecc_err_cnt: ECC error counter register
* @reg_user_data: User data register
+ * @reg_user_data_len: User data length register
* @reg_spare_area: Spare Area Register
* @reg_pat_id: Pattern ID Register
* @reg_pat_found: Data Pattern Status Register
@@ -249,14 +294,24 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* @dma_maxburst: DMA maxburst
* @ecc_strengths: Available ECC strengths array
* @nstrengths: Size of @ecc_strengths
+ * @max_ecc_steps: Maximum supported steps for ECC, this is also the
+ * number of user data registers
+ * @user_data_len_tab: Table of lenghts supported by USER_DATA_LEN register
+ * The table index is the value to set in NFC_USER_DATA_LEN
+ * registers, and the corresponding value is the number of
+ * bytes to write
+ * @nuser_data_tab: Size of @user_data_len_tab
* @sram_size: Size of the NAND controller SRAM
*/
struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
bool has_ecc_block_512;
+ bool has_ecc_clk;
+ bool has_mbus_clk;
unsigned int reg_io_data;
unsigned int reg_ecc_err_cnt;
unsigned int reg_user_data;
+ unsigned int reg_user_data_len;
unsigned int reg_spare_area;
unsigned int reg_pat_id;
unsigned int reg_pat_found;
@@ -268,6 +323,9 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int dma_maxburst;
const u8 *ecc_strengths;
unsigned int nstrengths;
+ const u8 *user_data_len_tab;
+ unsigned int nuser_data_tab;
+ unsigned int max_ecc_steps;
int sram_size;
};
@@ -279,6 +337,8 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
* @regs: NAND controller registers
* @ahb_clk: NAND controller AHB clock
* @mod_clk: NAND controller mod clock
+ * @ecc_clk: NAND controller ECC clock
+ * @mbus_clk: NAND controller MBUS clock
* @reset: NAND controller reset line
* @assigned_cs: bitmask describing already assigned CS lines
* @clk_rate: NAND controller current clock rate
@@ -294,6 +354,8 @@ struct sunxi_nfc {
void __iomem *regs;
struct clk *ahb_clk;
struct clk *mod_clk;
+ struct clk *ecc_clk;
+ struct clk *mbus_clk;
struct reset_control *reset;
unsigned long assigned_cs;
unsigned long clk_rate;
@@ -774,6 +836,53 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_get_prot_oob_bytes(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob,
sunxi_nfc_randomize_bbm(nand, page, oob);
}
+/*
+ * On H6/H6 the user_data length has to be set in specific registers
+ * before writing.
+ */
+static void sunxi_nfc_reset_user_data_len(struct sunxi_nfc *nfc)
+{
+ int loop_step = NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN_CAPACITY;
+
+ /* not all SoCs have this register */
+ if (!nfc->caps->reg_user_data_len)
+ return;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < nfc->caps->max_ecc_steps; i += loop_step)
+ writel(0, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN(nfc, i));
+}
+
+static void sunxi_nfc_set_user_data_len(struct sunxi_nfc *nfc,
+ int len, int step)
+{
+ bool found = false;
+ u32 val;
+ int i;
+
+ /* not all SoCs have this register */
+ if (!nfc->caps->reg_user_data_len)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nfc->caps->nuser_data_tab; i++) {
+ if (len == nfc->caps->user_data_len_tab[i]) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!found) {
+ dev_warn(nfc->dev,
+ "Unsupported length for user data reg: %d\n", len);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ val = readl(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN(nfc, step));
+
+ val &= ~NFC_USER_DATA_LEN_MSK(step);
+ val |= field_prep(NFC_USER_DATA_LEN_MSK(step), i);
+ writel(val, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA_LEN(nfc, step));
+}
+
static void sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_set_prot_oob_bytes(struct nand_chip *nand,
const u8 *oob, int step,
bool bbm, int page)
@@ -868,6 +977,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
if (ret)
return ret;
+ sunxi_nfc_reset_user_data_len(nfc);
+ sunxi_nfc_set_user_data_len(nfc, USER_DATA_SZ, 0);
sunxi_nfc_randomizer_config(nand, page, false);
sunxi_nfc_randomizer_enable(nand);
writel(NFC_DATA_TRANS | NFC_DATA_SWAP_METHOD | NFC_ECC_OP,
@@ -978,6 +1089,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_read_chunks_dma(struct nand_chip *nand, uint8_t *buf
return ret;
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_enable(nand);
+ sunxi_nfc_reset_user_data_len(nfc);
+ sunxi_nfc_set_user_data_len(nfc, USER_DATA_SZ, 0);
sunxi_nfc_randomizer_config(nand, page, false);
sunxi_nfc_randomizer_enable(nand);
@@ -1110,6 +1223,8 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_chunk(struct nand_chip *nand,
sunxi_nfc_randomizer_config(nand, page, false);
sunxi_nfc_randomizer_enable(nand);
+ sunxi_nfc_reset_user_data_len(nfc);
+ sunxi_nfc_set_user_data_len(nfc, USER_DATA_SZ, 0);
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_set_prot_oob_bytes(nand, oob, 0, bbm, page);
writel(NFC_DATA_TRANS | NFC_DATA_SWAP_METHOD |
@@ -1354,10 +1469,12 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_page_dma(struct nand_chip *nand,
if (ret)
goto pio_fallback;
+ sunxi_nfc_reset_user_data_len(nfc);
for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
const u8 *oob = nand->oob_poi + (i * (ecc->bytes + USER_DATA_SZ));
sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_set_prot_oob_bytes(nand, oob, i, !i, page);
+ sunxi_nfc_set_user_data_len(nfc, USER_DATA_SZ, i);
}
nand_prog_page_begin_op(nand, page, 0, NULL, 0);
@@ -2158,6 +2275,10 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (irq < 0)
return irq;
+ nfc->caps = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!nfc->caps)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
nfc->ahb_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "ahb");
if (IS_ERR(nfc->ahb_clk)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to retrieve ahb clk\n");
@@ -2170,6 +2291,22 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(nfc->mod_clk);
}
+ if (nfc->caps->has_ecc_clk) {
+ nfc->ecc_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "ecc");
+ if (IS_ERR(nfc->ecc_clk)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to retrieve ecc clk\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(nfc->ecc_clk);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (nfc->caps->has_mbus_clk) {
+ nfc->mbus_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "mbus");
+ if (IS_ERR(nfc->mbus_clk)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to retrieve mbus clk\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(nfc->mbus_clk);
+ }
+ }
+
nfc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, "ahb");
if (IS_ERR(nfc->reset))
return PTR_ERR(nfc->reset);
@@ -2180,12 +2317,6 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
- nfc->caps = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
- if (!nfc->caps) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_ahb_reset_reassert;
- }
-
ret = sunxi_nfc_rst(nfc);
if (ret)
goto out_ahb_reset_reassert;
@@ -2236,6 +2367,14 @@ static const u8 sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10[] = {
16, 24, 28, 32, 40, 48, 56, 60, 64
};
+static const u8 sunxi_ecc_strengths_h6[] = {
+ 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80
+};
+
+static const u8 sunxi_user_data_len_h6[] = {
+ 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32
+};
+
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.has_ecc_block_512 = true,
.reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A10_IO_DATA,
@@ -2252,6 +2391,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.dma_maxburst = 4,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
+ .max_ecc_steps = 16,
.sram_size = 1024,
};
@@ -2272,9 +2412,34 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.dma_maxburst = 8,
.ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10,
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
+ .max_ecc_steps = 16,
.sram_size = 1024,
};
+static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_h616_caps = {
+ .has_ecc_clk = true,
+ .has_mbus_clk = true,
+ .reg_io_data = NFC_REG_A23_IO_DATA,
+ .reg_ecc_err_cnt = NFC_REG_H6_ECC_ERR_CNT,
+ .reg_user_data = NFC_REG_H6_USER_DATA,
+ .reg_user_data_len = NFC_REG_H6_USER_DATA_LEN,
+ .reg_spare_area = NFC_REG_H6_SPARE_AREA,
+ .reg_pat_id = NFC_REG_H6_PAT_ID,
+ .reg_pat_found = NFC_REG_H6_PAT_FOUND,
+ .random_en_mask = BIT(5),
+ .random_dir_mask = BIT(6),
+ .ecc_mode_mask = GENMASK(15, 8),
+ .ecc_err_mask = GENMASK(31, 0),
+ .pat_found_mask = GENMASK(31, 0),
+ .dma_maxburst = 8,
+ .ecc_strengths = sunxi_ecc_strengths_h6,
+ .nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_h6),
+ .user_data_len_tab = sunxi_user_data_len_h6,
+ .nuser_data_tab = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_user_data_len_h6),
+ .max_ecc_steps = 32,
+ .sram_size = 8192,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id sunxi_nfc_ids[] = {
{
.compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-nand",
@@ -2284,6 +2449,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id sunxi_nfc_ids[] = {
.compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-nand-controller",
.data = &sunxi_nfc_a23_caps,
},
+ {
+ .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-nand-controller",
+ .data = &sunxi_nfc_h616_caps,
+ },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sunxi_nfc_ids);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 16/16] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: add NAND controller
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Add support for H616 nand controller Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 7:35 ` Richard Genoud
2025-10-28 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Miquel Raynal
2025-10-28 17:05 ` (subset) " Chen-Yu Tsai
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Richard Genoud @ 2025-10-28 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold, Maxime Ripard,
Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-sunxi, linux-kernel, Richard Genoud
The H616 has a NAND controller quite similar to the A10/A23 ones, but
with some register differences, more clocks (for ECC and MBUS), more ECC
strengths, so this requires a new compatible string.
Add the NAND controller node and pins in the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
---
.../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
index ceedae9e399b..2a4d70298655 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h616.dtsi
@@ -304,6 +304,42 @@ mmc2_pins: mmc2-pins {
bias-pull-up;
};
+ /omit-if-no-ref/
+ nand_pins: nand-pins {
+ pins = "PC0", "PC1", "PC2", "PC5", "PC8", "PC9",
+ "PC10", "PC11", "PC12", "PC13", "PC14",
+ "PC15", "PC16";
+ function = "nand0";
+ };
+
+ /omit-if-no-ref/
+ nand_cs0_pin: nand-cs0-pin {
+ pins = "PC4";
+ function = "nand0";
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+
+ /omit-if-no-ref/
+ nand_cs1_pin: nand-cs1-pin {
+ pins = "PC3";
+ function = "nand0";
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+
+ /omit-if-no-ref/
+ nand_rb0_pin: nand-rb0-pin {
+ pins = "PC6";
+ function = "nand0";
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+
+ /omit-if-no-ref/
+ nand_rb1_pin: nand-rb1-pin {
+ pins = "PC7";
+ function = "nand0";
+ bias-pull-up;
+ };
+
/omit-if-no-ref/
spi0_pins: spi0-pins {
pins = "PC0", "PC2", "PC4";
@@ -377,6 +413,22 @@ iommu: iommu@30f0000 {
#iommu-cells = <1>;
};
+ nfc: nand-controller@4011000 {
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-nand-controller";
+ reg = <0x04011000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_NAND>, <&ccu CLK_NAND0>,
+ <&ccu CLK_NAND1>, <&ccu CLK_MBUS_NAND>;
+ clock-names = "ahb", "mod", "ecc", "mbus";
+ resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_NAND>;
+ reset-names = "ahb";
+ dmas = <&dma 10>;
+ dma-names = "rxtx";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
mmc0: mmc@4020000 {
compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h616-mmc",
"allwinner,sun50i-a100-mmc";
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: add NAND controller Richard Genoud
@ 2025-10-28 16:23 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-10-28 17:05 ` (subset) " Chen-Yu Tsai
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Miquel Raynal @ 2025-10-28 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai, Jernej Skrabec,
Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Miquel Raynal, Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold,
Maxime Ripard, Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-sunxi, linux-kernel
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:34:53 +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
> This patch series introduce H6/H616 NAND controller support (but not yet
> the DMA/MDMA part).
>
> All the work was done on a H616 board with a Kioxia TC58NVG1S3HTA00 NAND
> chip.
> ECC is supported, as well as scrambling.
>
> [...]
Applied to nand/next after fixing the Links:, thanks!
[01/16] dt-bindings: mtd: sunxi: Add H616 compatible
commit: 7c99743a0b10d18abe6895c01843aa5d7f8a2a6f
[02/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Remove superfluous register readings
commit: deaa77ed66bf6ed1f7c06c183bd7a5bc0d931c62
[03/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Replace hard coded value by a define
commit: 1be7ac78b72f25e0e2ae2288944da31d08edc2f6
[04/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: move ECC strenghts in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: 94dc08adaf927b8a1d4de606055cf1a9c7256425
[05/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_ecc_err_cnt in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: 4a3a05681432c4a3bf9f7af3c813baf33bb143e8
[06/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_user_data in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: f53c74d0577426bcf604dd2f087da812812a6538
[07/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found registers
commit: 6fc2619af1eb6f5994a27e8617ac0911cdba81b8
[08/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: add has_ecc_block_512 capability
commit: 8c1b28ab3e4ec8d709c47928e1e6ecaee873d74b
[09/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_mode_mask in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: d21b4338159ff7d796e0c809a29d3425b2864115
[10/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce random en/dir in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: 1340fa872102cd7eebdcc358965381d5928803c0
[11/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_pat_id in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: ee61bba4ee7ca6a862ec8c8e76b2051606f25e97
[12/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce reg_spare_area in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: 6208274d0a27b81ae5425c819810fcd7bf89636a
[13/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_err_mask in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: 97d13bcea2306f47d5e54e5a347d5ca5817deb0d
[14/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce sram_size in sunxi_nfc_caps
commit: 5ddfbc68ec7ac92ff64d8420909b1258be3ca8a1
[15/16] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: Add support for H616 nand controller
commit: 88fd4e4deae87fa66e0e00e2bf6a4c362d241215
Patche(s) should be available on mtd/linux.git and will be
part of the next PR (provided that no robot complains by then).
Kind regards,
Miquèl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support
2025-10-28 7:34 [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Richard Genoud
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2025-10-28 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] Introduce Allwinner H6/H616 NAND controller support Miquel Raynal
@ 2025-10-28 17:05 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
17 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Chen-Yu Tsai @ 2025-10-28 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miquel Raynal, Richard Weinberger, Vignesh Raghavendra,
Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Jernej Skrabec, Samuel Holland, Richard Genoud
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai, Uwe Kleine-König, Wentao Liang, Johan Hovold,
Maxime Ripard, Thomas Petazzoni, linux-mtd, devicetree,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-sunxi, linux-kernel
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:34:53 +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
> This patch series introduce H6/H616 NAND controller support (but not yet
> the DMA/MDMA part).
>
> All the work was done on a H616 board with a Kioxia TC58NVG1S3HTA00 NAND
> chip.
> ECC is supported, as well as scrambling.
>
> [...]
Applied to sunxi/dt-for-6.19 in local tree, thanks!
[16/16] arm64: dts: allwinner: h616: add NAND controller
commit: f55a2526317aca8ecc1b21b346dbdebbc6aad97d
I also fixed up alignment of the clocks property in the nand-controller
node.
Best regards,
--
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread