From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yuichi Ito <ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:31:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v92crbtf.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001144406.7719-1-kernelfans@gmail.com>
On Fri, 01 Oct 2021 15:44:03 +0100,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When an IRQ is taken, some accounting needs to be performed to enter and
> exit IRQ context around the IRQ handler. Historically arch code would
> leave this to the irqchip or core IRQ code, but these days we want this
> to happen in exception entry code, and architectures such as arm64 do
> this.
>
> Currently handle_domain_irq() performs this entry/exit accounting, and
> if used on an architecture where the entry code also does this, the
> entry/exit accounting will be performed twice per IRQ. This is
> problematic as core RCU code such as rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()
> depends on this happening once per IRQ, and will not detect quescent
> periods correctly, leading to stall warnings.
>
> As irqchip drivers which use handle_domain_irq() need to work on
> architectures with or without their own entry/exit accounting, this
> patch makes handle_domain_irq() conditionally perform the entry
> accounting depending on a new HAVE_ARCH_IRQENTRY Kconfig symbol that
> architectures can select if they perform this entry accounting
> themselves.
>
> V3 -> V4:
> address Signed-off-by in [2/3]
> improve commit log in [3/3]
>
> V2 -> V3:
> Drop other patches and concentrate on the purpose of [3-4/5] of V2.
> And lift the level, where to add {irq_enter,exit}_rcu(), from the
> interrupt controler to exception entry
>
> History:
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1607912752-12481-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210924132837.45994-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
> V3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210930131708.35328-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
>
>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Yuichi Ito <ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>
> Mark Rutland (1):
> arm64: entry: refactor EL1 interrupt entry logic
>
> Pingfan Liu (2):
> kernel/irq: make irq_{enter,exit}() in handle_domain_irq() arch
> optional
> arm64: entry: avoid double-accounting IRQ RCU entry
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> kernel/irq/Kconfig | 3 ++
> kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 4 +++
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Given that most of the changes are in the arm64 tree, it'd be good if
the whole series went via the arm64 tree, most probably as a fix.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-01 14:44 [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] kernel/irq: make irq_{enter, exit}() in handle_domain_irq() arch optional Pingfan Liu
2021-10-04 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-01 14:44 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] arm64: entry: refactor EL1 interrupt entry logic Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] arm64: entry: avoid double-accounting IRQ RCU entry Pingfan Liu
2021-10-04 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-10-05 17:17 ` [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v92crbtf.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).