From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F0CC433DF for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14D22065F for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="KnZ7LJhJ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="QV0xRcAw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C14D22065F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From:References:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=q1R7ecv0qbp2puqOgIA8/3b8cXCOmTNLd0g/fB5d5/8=; b=KnZ7LJhJuMi81Pf1yNv7w/sn7 9a8SxxsK7uwXzIJzgLNLIfbOfTzamP4b0Z4M4RTNJcB3/0Z9TQh1GPh+o3T3B8pmx5Lql3a6MZboE /BxwfWsQ8mDDHfFYB6HEqQoJYX3NmNS4qcvQgJNRvjNzzikwGxrdmDWm2hEZFKwBA9d27KRhLuWdl 6smLRIIZUDsWs25H0JH1kgOcN9gaVKfq2nfzPdXbl5tRA8YKsigvSxdlcm9NdWzVTW5Qct15F9giz MaqJc6FPSgeEn4rhHGmDA8Oc/0N2F37M/wUqSGgTV4h+EaNwBz15kx/u8rBb1NvFykTmmQLJcxdPm rdZwjyPow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyYA4-00046s-36; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:09:12 +0000 Received: from esa3.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.233]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyY9z-00044x-8R for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:09:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1595498947; x=1627034947; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=Ke9E7JJ3zQ2XCPvF/ZiJvhJqLTFeRFCsv/7IuKKbagQ=; b=QV0xRcAw729XwMdF/8D/lOcE0mk4J+KBnzargQvtl335fp3hPWIyw3K+ wWK9IRHyAZWAoNI6XmEpRBdcsuohbpFPLxYozl2GLAiHWrmSEeOV19bl8 vBnfRNtoJsUAWQrmBjorJsJqpFpNzin8sYNYa1nt9PGDGqfyxN9oiUAE9 8OhWLMpHSXp9Yt9ylLA9i6XOMTXz8onPc+lGhNYQiOxGnA0PYO82x+oOj pScD8R23JOOhUy+RP0hcfpaXGVHB7cfNXa6U5z7u60S1kJHOOuhcqP4h4 almWChvJrrsVWzQVqV8V3X1HPs10CGywuSw0CIt/baz+PJ3gegLvQOndb A==; IronPort-SDR: ILYu3poOG836t6YdFhhy7gRwahSmw/PjhZTTy1y+ww68TrIdV3l/q3YZ1OYi6dpKEY6kFS3qYS HR+d2nKC7+zdK4+OpGOh/rBjwf947+pHLSxvKcD87AN7UTz3Yt8tO4irhrCCMLZAUFEnzq/oIE Ng+bTkCoXaB2d6sxUGWepoGjGiK56pCDVK81Vo8D341+ZwHLyfPpHeBpgDeizgHgxiMnvk3Aan Ql41m9S/EAtBNNAL7wrD8JXbdjMMH6SwpHZsKo2xJetKCYf6q+3eY/VD1mhGWobY/Pvm2uS5mj Vf8= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,386,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="85093580" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 23 Jul 2020 03:09:04 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:08:22 -0700 Received: from soft-dev15.microsemi.net.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:09:01 -0700 References: <20200615133242.24911-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com> From: Lars Povlsen To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:09:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9iek0g3.fsf@soft-dev15.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200723_060907_488883_0FDAFAF1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Cc: DTML , Alexandre Belloni , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Stephen Boyd , Steen Hegelund , linux-clk , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Microchip Linux Driver Support , Michael Turquette , SoC Team , Linux ARM , Olof Johansson , Adrian Hunter , Linus Walleij , Lars Povlsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Arnd Bergmann writes: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:33 PM Lars Povlsen wrote: >> >> This patch series adds support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC, the CPU >> system of a advanced, TSN capable gigabit switch. The CPU is an armv8 >> x 2 CPU core (A53). >> >> Although this is an ARM core, it shares some peripherals with the >> Microsemi Ocelot MIPS SoC. > > I've picked up this version of the series into an arm/newsoc branch in > the soc tree, > except for the pinctrl patch that Linus Walleij already merged. > Great! Thanks a lot for following up! > I see you still have a few pending patches for other subsystems (spi, mmc) > and I'm not sure what the status is for those and am dropping them for the > moment. > Yes, I had a question out for the SPI maintainer but did not get any feedback, so I was thinking just doing my own assumptions and refreshing the series - probably tomorrow. I also just bumped the MMC maintainer (Adrian) yesterday, as he did send a me an 'Acked-by', but it hasn't been merged it seems. > Once the bindings are accepted by the respective subsystem maintainers, > please send any remaining DT patches as a follow-up to what I've already > merged. > I'll try to work out the puzzle, might need to reach out directly to to determine whats missing. Later, ---Lars > Arnd -- Lars Povlsen, Microchip _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel