From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT) Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:52:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: marvell: use SPDX-License-Identifier for Armada SoCs In-Reply-To: <20180105134046.12915b36@windsurf.lan> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:40:46 +0100") References: <20180105115329.1233-1-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20180105115329.1233-2-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20180105134046.12915b36@windsurf.lan> Message-ID: <87vagga2nd.fsf@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Thomas, On ven., janv. 05 2018, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:53:23 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the >> wrongly stated X11 to MIT. >> >> As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly >> for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT >> license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim. >> >> [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html >> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html >> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi | 38 +------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-372x.dtsi | 38 +------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-37xx.dtsi | 38 +------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-7020.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-7040.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-70x0.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8020.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8080.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-80x0.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806-dual.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806-quad.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> .../dts/marvell/armada-ap810-ap0-octa-core.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap810-ap0.dtsi | 41 +--------------------- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 6 ++-- >> 17 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 596 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi >> index 11226f7b9ed9..dc1182ec9fa1 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > > The previous license was GPL-2.0+ or X11, not GPL-2.0+ or MIT. Any > reason to change from X11 to MIT ? As explained in the commit log: " the X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim." Also as I wrote it was already discussed on the mainling lists (device tree one and LAKML) see: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-February/489922.html Gregory > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com