From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:46:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] OMAP: omap_device: Add a method to build an
	omap_device from a DT node
In-Reply-To: <20110929173006.GG6800@ponder.secretlab.ca> (Grant Likely's
	message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:30:06 -0500")
References: <1316724745-24896-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
	<1316724745-24896-3-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
	<20110927014632.GB20588@ponder.secretlab.ca> <4E81F42B.5070806@ti.com>
	<4E834748.50908@ti.com> <87fwjgv9sb.fsf@ti.com>
	<20110929173006.GG6800@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Message-ID: <87vcsboz4g.fsf@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:47:32AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi Grant, Kevin,
>> >
>> > Should I go ahead with this version and repost the series with that
>> > third patch?
>> 
>> Fine with me.
>> 
>> Grant let me know if you prefer if I merge it (with your ack) with the
>> rest of the series or if you want to take it to avoid conflicts.
>
> I'm happy with the way things have gone.  Go ahead and add my Ack and
> merge it through your tree.  I'd like to avoid the conflicts.

Thanks, I think keeping this series together will be smoothest.

Adding your ack, and queuing for v3.2 (branch: for_3.2/omap_device-2)

Kevin