Re: [patch V4 33/37] cpu/hotplug: Allow "parallel" bringup up to CPUHP_BP_KICK_AP_STATE

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
	"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
	Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@gmail.com>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@amazon.com>,
	"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
	Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@oracle.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 33/37] cpu/hotplug: Allow "parallel" bringup up to CPUHP_BP_KICK_AP_STATE
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 01:12:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn10ufj9.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ed3ff77-c973-4e23-9e2f-f10776e432b7@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, May 22 2023 at 23:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> That does not make any sense at all and my tired brain does not help
>> either.
>
>> Can you please apply the below debug patch and provide the output?
>
> Here's the log, a quick glance says the 
>
> 	if (!--ncpus)
> 		break;
>
> check is doing the wrong thing

Obviously.

Let me find a brown paperbag and go to sleep before I even try to
compile the obvious fix.

---

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 005f863a3d2b..88a7ede322bd 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -1770,9 +1770,6 @@ static void __init cpuhp_bringup_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int n
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
 		struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, cpu);
 
-		if (!--ncpus)
-			break;
-
 		if (cpu_up(cpu, target) && can_rollback_cpu(st)) {
 			/*
 			 * If this failed then cpu_up() might have only
@@ -1781,6 +1778,9 @@ static void __init cpuhp_bringup_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int n
 			 */
 			WARN_ON(cpuhp_invoke_callback_range(false, cpu, st, CPUHP_OFFLINE));
 		}
+
+		if (!--ncpus)
+			break;
 	}
 }
 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
