From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?=)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:07:49 +0000
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/6] run_tests: allow passing of options to
 QEMU
In-Reply-To: <648638bd-a90e-ee98-337a-223ed533f53a@redhat.com>
References: <20170111162841.15569-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
 <20170111162841.15569-7-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
 <20170112173204.ufd2ggw7iz7xv772@hawk.localdomain>
 <648638bd-a90e-ee98-337a-223ed533f53a@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <87wpdtubxm.fsf@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org


Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> On 12/01/2017 18:32, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> +# Any options left for QEMU?
>>> +shift $((OPTIND-1))
>>> +if [ "$#" -gt  0 ]; then
>>> +    extra_opts="$@"
>>> +fi
>> We can unconditionally do the extra_opts="$@", extra_opts will just
>> be null in the case there aren't more args, like it was before.
>
> extra_opts is not an array, so this would mess up options that contain
> spaces.  (Alex's patch in general, not your tweak).

Is it worth treating extra_opts as an array?

>
> Paolo
>
>>> +
>>>  RUNTIME_log_stderr () { cat >> test.log; }
>>>  RUNTIME_log_stdout () {
>>>      if [ "$PRETTY_PRINT_STACKS" = "yes" ]; then
>>> @@ -59,4 +68,4 @@ RUNTIME_log_stdout () {
>>>  config=$TEST_DIR/unittests.cfg
>>>  rm -f test.log
>>>  printf "BUILD_HEAD=$(cat build-head)\n\n" > test.log
>>> -for_each_unittest $config run
>>> +for_each_unittest $config run "$extra_opts"


--
Alex Benn?e