From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup bootrom DT warning
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:36:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpgbekwg.fsf@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161110092221.0219490b@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:22:21 +0100")
Hi Thomas,
On jeu., nov. 10 2016, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 01:09:50 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> - bootrom {
>> + bootrom at 0 {
>> compatible = "marvell,bootrom";
>> reg = <MBUS_ID(0x01, 0x1d) 0 0x100000>;
>
> I am still not sure whether this "0" unit address is correct compared
> to the reg property being passed.
I chose to use the adress register inside the window memory.
>
> A good example of why I'm worried is the sa-sram case:
>
> + crypto_sram0: sa-sram0 at 0 {
> compatible = "mmio-sram";
> reg = <MBUS_ID(0x09, 0x09) 0 0x800>;
>
> + crypto_sram1: sa-sram1 at 0 {
> compatible = "mmio-sram";
> reg = <MBUS_ID(0x09, 0x05) 0 0x800>;
>
> The node names should be just "sram" without a number. Indeed for UARTs
> for example, you use uart at XYZ, uart at ABC and not uart0 at XYZ and
> uart1 at ABC. But then, if you do that, with your scheme, you end up with
> both nodes named sa-sram at 0.
>
> Which clearly shows that the way you set this unit-address is not
> correct: those two devices are mapped at completely different
> locations, but you end up with an identical unit address.
>
> I have no idea what is the rule for setting the unit address in this
> case, but I'm pretty sure the rule you've chosen is not good.
I don't know if there is an existing rules for this case. But I see your
concern. What I propose then is to expose the memory windows ID by
adding the target and the attributes like this:
crypto_sram0: sa-sram at 09_09_0 {
compatible = "mmio-sram";
reg = <MBUS_ID(0x09, 0x09) 0 0x800>;
crypto_sram1: sa-sram at 09_05_0 {
compatible = "mmio-sram";
reg = <MBUS_ID(0x09, 0x05) 0 0x800>;
Gregory
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-10 0:09 [PATCH 00/14] Various Armada 375 DT warning fixup Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Add node labels Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Use the " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup mdio DT warning Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup bootrom " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 8:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-10 9:36 ` Gregory CLEMENT [this message]
2016-11-10 10:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-10 10:43 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup devbus " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup sa-ram " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup pcie DT warnings Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:22 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup pinctrl " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup soc DT warning Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup internal-regs " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Remove skeleton.dtsi Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup memory DT warning Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-10 0:10 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup ethernet child " Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpgbekwg.fsf@free-electrons.com \
--to=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox