From: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@gmail.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna@fastmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rkisp1: allow non-coherent video capture buffers
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:29:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0zcq8wy.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAFQd5C89M1TtpaCoK56Jd2Kq+h6+z552KY6cAqiDjMjDCFdWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-01-15 at 23:46 +09, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:30 PM Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On 2025-01-15 at 17:31 +09, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Mikhail and Laurent,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:07 AM Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Laurent,
>> >>
>> >> On 2025-01-03 at 17:23 +02, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 06:35:00PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
>> >> >> Currently, the rkisp1 driver always uses coherent DMA allocations for
>> >> >> video capture buffers. However, on some platforms, using non-coherent
>> >> >> buffers can improve performance, especially when CPU processing of
>> >> >> MMAP'ed video buffers is required.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For example, on the Rockchip RK3399 running at maximum CPU frequency,
>> >> >> the time to memcpy a frame from a 1280x720 XRGB32 MMAP'ed buffer to a
>> >> >> malloc'ed userspace buffer decreases from 7.7 ms to 1.1 ms when using
>> >> >> non-coherent DMA allocation. CPU usage also decreases accordingly.
>> >> >
>> >> > What's the time taken by the cache management operations ?
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for the late reply, your question turned out a little more
>> >> interesting than I expected initially. :)
>> >>
>> >> When capturing using Yavta with MMAP buffers under the conditions mentioned
>> >> in the commit message, ftrace gives 437.6 +- 1.1 us for
>> >> dma_sync_sgtable_for_cpu and 409 +- 14 us for
>> >> dma_sync_sgtable_for_device. Thus, it looks like using non-coherent
>> >> buffers in this case is more CPU-efficient even when considering cache
>> >> management overhead.
>> >>
>> >> When trying to do the same measurements with libcamera, I failed. In a
>> >> typical libcamera use case when MMAP buffers are allocated from a
>> >> device, exported as dmabufs and then used for capture on the same device
>> >> with DMABUF memory type, cache management in kernel is skipped [1]
>> >> [2]. Also, vb2_dc_dmabuf_ops_{begin,end}_cpu_access are no-ops [3], so
>> >> DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC from userspace does not work either.
>> >
>> > Oops, so I believe this is a bug. When an MMAP buffer is allocated in
>> > the non-coherent mode, those ops should perform proper cache
>> > maintenance.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out!
>>
>> > Let me send a patch to fix this in a couple of days unless someone
>> > does it earlier.
>>
>> Now that we know that this is a bug, not an API misuse from my side, I
>> can fix this myself and send a v2. Would this be okay for you?
>
> I'd be more than happy :)
Done, see [1]. A review would be appreciated. :)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250115-b4-rkisp-noncoherent-v2-0-0853e1a24012@gmail.com/
--
Best regards,
Mikhail Rudenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-02 15:35 [PATCH] media: rkisp1: allow non-coherent video capture buffers Mikhail Rudenko
2025-01-03 15:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-01-14 16:00 ` Mikhail Rudenko
2025-01-15 8:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2025-01-15 13:24 ` Mikhail Rudenko
2025-01-15 14:46 ` Tomasz Figa
2025-01-15 17:29 ` Mikhail Rudenko [this message]
2025-01-15 19:13 ` Nicolas Dufresne
2025-02-27 17:05 ` Jacopo Mondi
2025-02-27 20:46 ` Mikhail Rudenko
2025-02-28 2:58 ` Nicolas Dufresne
2025-02-28 9:54 ` Hans Verkuil
2025-02-28 10:00 ` Tomasz Figa
2025-02-28 10:18 ` Jacopo Mondi
2025-02-28 10:28 ` Tomasz Figa
2025-02-28 10:48 ` Jacopo Mondi
2025-02-28 11:19 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0zcq8wy.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=mike.rudenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dafna@fastmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).