From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, keyur@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate ISTATUS when emulated timers are fired.
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 13:53:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1qqe2pg.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824060304.21128-3-gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:03:03 +0100,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> Guest-Hypervisor forwards the timer interrupt to Guest-Guest, if it is
> enabled, unmasked and ISTATUS bit of register CNTV_CTL_EL0 is set for a
> loaded timer.
>
> For NV2 implementation, the Host-Hypervisor is not emulating the ISTATUS
> bit while forwarding the Emulated Vtimer Interrupt to Guest-Hypervisor.
> This results in the drop of interrupt from Guest-Hypervisor, where as
> Host Hypervisor marked it as an active interrupt and expecting Guest-Guest
> to consume and acknowledge. Due to this, some of the Guest-Guest vCPUs
> are stuck in Idle thread and rcu soft lockups are seen.
>
> This issue is not seen with NV1 case since the register CNTV_CTL_EL0 read
> trap handler is emulating the ISTATUS bit.
>
> Adding code to set/emulate the ISTATUS when the emulated timers are fired.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> index 27a6ec46803a..0b32d943d2d5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static u64 kvm_arm_timer_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct arch_timer_context *timer,
> enum kvm_arch_timer_regs treg);
> static bool kvm_arch_timer_get_input_level(int vintid);
> +static u64 read_timer_ctl(struct arch_timer_context *timer);
>
> static struct irq_ops arch_timer_irq_ops = {
> .get_input_level = kvm_arch_timer_get_input_level,
> @@ -356,6 +357,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart kvm_hrtimer_expire(struct hrtimer *hrt)
> return HRTIMER_RESTART;
> }
>
> + /* Timer emulated, emulate ISTATUS also */
> + timer_set_ctl(ctx, read_timer_ctl(ctx));
Why should we do that for non-NV2 configurations?
> kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, true, ctx);
> return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> }
> @@ -458,6 +461,8 @@ static void timer_emulate(struct arch_timer_context *ctx)
> trace_kvm_timer_emulate(ctx, should_fire);
>
> if (should_fire != ctx->irq.level) {
> + /* Timer emulated, emulate ISTATUS also */
> + timer_set_ctl(ctx, read_timer_ctl(ctx));
> kvm_timer_update_irq(ctx->vcpu, should_fire, ctx);
> return;
> }
I'm not overly keen on this. Yes, we can set the status bit there. But
conversely, the bit will not get cleared when the guest reprograms the
timer, and will take a full exit/entry cycle for it to appear.
Ergo, the architecture is buggy as memory (the VNCR page) cannot be
used to emulate something as dynamic as a timer.
It is only with FEAT_ECV that we can solve this correctly by trapping
the counter/timer accesses and emulate them for the guest hypervisor.
I'd rather we add support for that, as I expect all the FEAT_NV2
implementations to have it (and hopefully FEAT_FGT as well).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-29 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 6:03 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for Nested Virtualization issues Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-08-24 6:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: nv: only emulate timers that have not yet fired Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-12-29 13:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09 12:25 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-09 13:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09 14:03 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-08-24 6:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Emulate ISTATUS when emulated timers are fired Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-12-29 13:53 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-01-02 11:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-03 4:21 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-10 8:41 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-10 10:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-24 6:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid block mapping if max_map_size is smaller than block size Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-12-29 17:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-03 4:26 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-09 13:58 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-10-10 5:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for Nested Virtualization issues Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2022-10-19 7:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-10 12:17 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-10 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-10 21:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 7:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 8:46 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-11 8:48 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-11 11:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11 12:46 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2023-01-11 13:36 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y1qqe2pg.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=keyur@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).