linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Disable privileged hypercalls after pKVM finalisation
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:11:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y27ntp1m.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210923130211.GB15934@willie-the-truck>

On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:02:11 +0100,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 01:56:21PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:22:56 +0100,
> > Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:

[...]

> > >  static void handle_host_hcall(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> > >  {
> > >  	DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, id, host_ctxt, 0);
> > > +	unsigned long hcall_min = 0;
> > >  	hcall_t hfn;
> > >  
> > > +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized))
> > > +		hcall_min = __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_prot_finalize;
> > > +
> > >  	id -= KVM_HOST_SMCCC_ID(0);
> > >  
> > > -	if (unlikely(id >= ARRAY_SIZE(host_hcall)))
> > > +	if (unlikely(id < hcall_min || id >= ARRAY_SIZE(host_hcall)))
> > 
> > So I can still issue a pkvm_prot_finalize after finalisation? Seems
> > odd. As hcall_min has to be inclusive, you probably want it to be set
> > to __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_host_share_hyp once protected.
> 
> Yeah, I ended up addresing that one in the previous patch. The problem is
> that we need to allow pkvm_prot_finalize to be called on each CPU, so I
> think we'd end up having an extra "really finalize damnit!" call to be
> issued _once_ after each CPU is done with the finalisation if we want
> to lock it down.
> 
> The approach I took instead is to make pkvm_prot_finalize return -EBUSY
> if it's called on a CPU where it's already been called.

Ah, I see. Serves me right for reading patches out of order. Finalise
is of course per-CPU, and the static key global. Epic fail.

Probably deserves a comment, because I'm surely going to jump at that
again in three months.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-23 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23 11:22 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Restrict host hypercalls when pKVM is enabled Will Deacon
2021-09-23 11:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: Prevent kexec and hibernation if is_protected_kvm_enabled() Will Deacon
2021-09-23 11:45   ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-23 12:29     ` Will Deacon
2021-09-23 11:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Reject stub hypercalls after pKVM has been initialised Will Deacon
2021-09-29 13:37   ` Quentin Perret
2021-09-23 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Propagate errors from __pkvm_prot_finalize hypercall Will Deacon
2021-09-29 13:36   ` Quentin Perret
2021-10-05 11:30     ` Will Deacon
2021-09-23 11:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Prevent re-finalisation of pKVM for a given CPU Will Deacon
2021-09-29 13:41   ` Quentin Perret
2021-09-23 11:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Disable privileged hypercalls after pKVM finalisation Will Deacon
2021-09-23 12:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-23 13:02     ` Will Deacon
2021-09-23 13:11       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-09-23 12:58   ` Will Deacon
2021-09-23 12:21 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Restrict host hypercalls when pKVM is enabled Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y27ntp1m.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).