From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFT 6/8] ARM: OMAP: remove unused cpu_is_omap3505()
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:20:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5pduof8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuVYXooj5CPzZZhOL8asmoX5X1bB=D-7pyf4McgKOATmyg@mail.gmail.com> (Jean Pihet's message of "Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:07:16 +0200")
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> writes:
> Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>> The 3505 check is now unused and can be removed.
>>
>> There are no longer any cpu_is_* checks that depend on specific IP
>> detection.
>>
>> Acked-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> ?arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | ? ?8 +-------
>> ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h
>> index 41f3e5a..b34bf6c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h
>> @@ -250,8 +250,7 @@ IS_AM_SUBCLASS(335x, 0x335)
>> ?* cpu_is_omap2423(): ?True for OMAP2423
>> ?* cpu_is_omap2430(): ?True for OMAP2430
>> ?* cpu_is_omap3430(): ?True for OMAP3430
>> - * cpu_is_omap3505(): ?True for OMAP3505
>> - * cpu_is_omap3517(): ?True for OMAP3517
>> + * cpu_is_omap3517(): ?True for AM35x: OMAP3517, OMAP3505
> Is cpu_is_omap35xx() a better name for it?
Later in the series, it is renamed to cpu_is_am35xx().
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-30 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-26 23:29 [PATCH/RFT 0/8] ARM: OMAP: remove IP checks from SoC family detection Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 1/8] ARM: OMAP: remove unused cpu_is macros that depend on specific IP checks Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 2/8] ARM: OMAP3: clock data: replace 3503/3517 flag with AM35x flag for UART4 Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 3/8] ARM: OMAP3: clock data: treat all AM35x devices the same Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 4/8] ARM: OMAP: AM35x: remove redunant cpu_is checks for AM3505 Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 5/8] ARM: OMAP: clock: remove unused CK_3505 flag Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 9:05 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-30 17:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 6/8] ARM: OMAP: remove unused cpu_is_omap3505() Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 9:07 ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-30 9:35 ` Koen Kooi
2012-04-30 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 7/8] ARM: OMAP: remove unused cpu_is_omap3530() Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 23:29 ` [PATCH/RFT 8/8] ARM: OMAP: AM35xx: convert 3517 detection/flags to AM35xx Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 22:08 ` [PATCH/RFT 0/8] ARM: OMAP: remove IP checks from SoC family detection Mark A. Greer
2012-04-27 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 16:25 ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-30 20:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 23:47 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y5pduof8.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).