From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:20:27 -0700 Subject: [PATCH/RFT 6/8] ARM: OMAP: remove unused cpu_is_omap3505() In-Reply-To: (Jean Pihet's message of "Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:07:16 +0200") References: <1335482993-14035-1-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> <1335482993-14035-7-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com> Message-ID: <87y5pduof8.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Jean Pihet writes: > Kevin, > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> The 3505 check is now unused and can be removed. >> >> There are no longer any cpu_is_* checks that depend on specific IP >> detection. >> >> Acked-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >> Tested-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman >> --- >> ?arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h | ? ?8 +------- >> ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h >> index 41f3e5a..b34bf6c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h >> @@ -250,8 +250,7 @@ IS_AM_SUBCLASS(335x, 0x335) >> ?* cpu_is_omap2423(): ?True for OMAP2423 >> ?* cpu_is_omap2430(): ?True for OMAP2430 >> ?* cpu_is_omap3430(): ?True for OMAP3430 >> - * cpu_is_omap3505(): ?True for OMAP3505 >> - * cpu_is_omap3517(): ?True for OMAP3517 >> + * cpu_is_omap3517(): ?True for AM35x: OMAP3517, OMAP3505 > Is cpu_is_omap35xx() a better name for it? Later in the series, it is renamed to cpu_is_am35xx(). Kevin