public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i.MX51: Full iomux support
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:29:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y67rcdnf.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292421691-14615-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> (Sascha Hauer's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:01:29 +0100")

Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> writes:

> Hi,

Hi,

>
> The following series picks up the patch from Lothar Wa?mann replacing
> the struct pad_desc with a 64bit variable and adds full i.MX51 iomux
> support based on this patch.
> The iomux configurations are taken from the Freescale pinmux tool, so the
> definitions should be rather complete. Anyway, there are some modes
> not present in the tool.
> I took the padmux settings from the old iomux support where present.

I'm seeing a lot of changes in the iomux file and I have a patch [1]
setting the SION bit for all gpios configuration so that reading the PSR
value is giving usefull results when the gpio is configured as output. I
wanted to send it this week but it will obviously conflict with
this. Should I test your patchset first and if it's working, wait
for its merge or should I send it anyway ? How do you want to deal with
this (as long as you're fine with setting the SION bit for all gpios) ?

Thanks,
Arnaud

[1] http://git.rtp-net.org/?p=efika.git;a=blob;f=mx51_gpiolib_out_value.patch;h=62d4db72c1021f8cb756a728390dbab2ca02c44a;hb=HEAD

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-15 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-15 14:01 [PATCH] i.MX51: Full iomux support Sascha Hauer
2010-12-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] MXC IOMUX-V3 replace struct pad_desc with bitmapped cookie (step 2) Sascha Hauer
2010-12-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM i.MX51: Full iomux support Sascha Hauer
2010-12-15 14:29 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp) [this message]
2010-12-15 15:10   ` [PATCH] " Lothar Waßmann
2010-12-15 15:23     ` Sascha Hauer
2010-12-15 15:37     ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2010-12-27 17:47       ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2010-12-27 18:25       ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2010-12-28  7:38         ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-12-15 15:15   ` Sascha Hauer
2010-12-15 15:19     ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-12-15 16:12 ` Peter Horton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y67rcdnf.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org \
    --to=arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox