public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction"
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:59:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziah2m3f.fsf@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cce6903-d167-1bfc-38b4-1fdd7b3ff24b@codeaurora.org> (Timur Tabi's message of "Wed, 30 Aug 2017 07:31:41 -0500")

Hi Timur,
 
 On mer., ao?t 30 2017, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> On 8/30/17 4:24 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Therefore, with Timur's commit applied, when the system boots, we get
>> serial output, up to the point where gpiochip_add_data() is called, and
>> requests all GPIOs. Since our UART pins are not requested at the
>> pinctrl level, the gpio_request succeeds and re-muxes those pins as
>> GPIOs: we lose the UART.
>
> This part I don't understand.  My patch just only impacts the code
> that queries the direction of the GPIO.  It does not set the
> direction.
>
> When gpiochip_add_data() calls chip->request, what function is that
> calling?

the request callback is gpiochip_generic_request so I would be surprised
that there was a bug in it.

>
> The only thing I can think of is that the ->request function is not
> just returning status, but is also muxing the GPIO.  If so, then I
> think that's a bug.

Gregory

>
> -- 
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
> Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
>

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-30  9:24 linux-next regression caused by "gpiolib: request the gpio before querying its direction" Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 12:31 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 13:59   ` Gregory CLEMENT [this message]
2017-08-30 14:17     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 14:22       ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-30 14:32         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-30 16:24           ` jmondi
2017-08-30 19:38             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31  7:08       ` Linus Walleij
2017-08-31  7:18         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31  7:30           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31  9:22             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-08-31  9:39               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-08-31 18:39                 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31  9:50               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-08-31 13:05                 ` Timur Tabi
2017-08-31 10:08               ` Maxime Ripard
2017-08-31  7:04 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ziah2m3f.fsf@free-electrons.com \
    --to=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox