From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:56:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] clk: bcm2835: Add binding docs for the Raspberry Pi clock provider In-Reply-To: <20150811211840.31346.28666@quantum> References: <1437420787-32137-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> <1437420787-32137-2-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> <20150811211840.31346.28666@quantum> Message-ID: <87zj1w4cgl.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Michael Turquette writes: > Quoting Eric Anholt (2015-07-20 12:33:00) >> The hardware clocks are not controllable by the ARM, so we have to >> make requests to the firmware to do so from the VPU side. This will >> let us replace fixed clocks in our DT with actual clock control (and >> correct frequency information). >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt >> Acked-by: Stephen Warren >> Acked-by: Lee Jones > > Looks good to me. Do you want the clk patches to go through the clk tree > or do you want them all together? For this patch feel free to add: > > Acked-by: Michael Turquette It would be nice to do them all together in the arm-soc tree, since the later DT changes require that the clock driver be present. (And, since this is a dependency of the RPi2 work, it would let us stack that on top, too). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: