From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:40:09 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] omap2+: pm_bus: make functions used as pointers as
	static
In-Reply-To: <1294171634-13943-6-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's
	message of "Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:07:14 -0600")
References: <1294171634-13943-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
	<1294171634-13943-6-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
Message-ID: <87zkrg2nfa.fsf@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:

> omap_pm_runtime_suspend and omap_pm_runtime_resume are used
> as function pointers and does not really need to be exposed
> to the world.
>
> Fixes sparse warnings:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c:23:5: warning: symbol 'omap_pm_runtime_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c:40:5: warning: symbol 'omap_pm_runtime_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

Thanks, will queue this one in my pm-fixes branch for 2.6.38-rc.

Kevin

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c
> index 784989f..5acd2ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm_bus.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>  #include <plat/omap-pm.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> -int omap_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int omap_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>  	int r, ret = 0;
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int omap_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	return ret;
>  };
>  
> -int omap_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int omap_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>  	int r;