From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:34:23 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: New driver for TI DA8XX/OMAP-L138/AM18XX
 pinconf
In-Reply-To: <1479871767-20160-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com>
References: <1479871767-20160-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com>
 <1479871767-20160-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com>
Message-ID: <88b3d16b-6e5b-ea75-d770-35d9adc6c677@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
> This adds a new driver for pinconf on TI DA8XX/OMAP-L138/AM18XX. These

s/DA8XX/DA850/

> SoCs have a separate controller for controlling pullup/pulldown groups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>

> +static const char *da850_pupd_get_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +						 unsigned int selector)
> +{
> +	return da850_pupd_group_names[selector];
> +}
> +
> +static int da850_pupd_get_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +					 unsigned int selector,
> +					 const unsigned int **pins,
> +					 unsigned int *num_pins)
> +{
> +	*num_pins = 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

usage of get_get_ in the function names above is odd.

Thanks,
Sekhar