From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: amelie.delaunay@st.com (Amelie DELAUNAY) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:14:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: document the STM32 RTC bindings In-Reply-To: <20161205100630.n3gldznf524pucjm@piout.net> References: <1480687801-19525-2-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <1480687801-19525-4-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <20161205100630.n3gldznf524pucjm@piout.net> Message-ID: <88bf56d7-e8c2-b6ca-79fa-b9379ba44737@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Alexandre, Thanks for reviewing On 12/05/2016 11:06 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/12/2016 at 15:09:55 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote : >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the STM32 RTC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..4578838 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ >> +STM32 Real Time Clock >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible: "st,stm32-rtc". >> +- reg: address range of rtc register set. >> +- clocks: reference to the clock entry ck_rtc. >> +- clock-names: name of the clock used. Should be "ck_rtc". > > Is this name really useful? You're right, not useful. > >> +- interrupt-parent: phandle for the interrupt controller. >> +- interrupts: rtc alarm interrupt. >> +- interrupt-names: rtc alarm interrupt name, should be "alarm". > > Same comment, is this name really useful? Ditto. > > Best regards, Amelie