Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, git@amd.com,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Ajay Neeli <ajay.neeli@amd.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Sai Krishna Potthuri <sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:SCSI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: xilinx: ufs: move PHY/SRAM ready polling into the firmware backend
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:19:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <891250a6-ae3f-4abe-b58c-92c8b9cb35ee@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaeaaea8ed76069943e0706a0917139ff6569929.1785855749.git.michal.simek@amd.com>

Hi Martin,

On 8/4/26 17:02, Michal Simek wrote:
> The Versal Gen 2 UFS driver polls the firmware for M-PHY TX/RX
> configuration readiness and SRAM initialisation completion with two
> open-coded do/while loops. Each iteration is a full firmware round-trip
> (PM_IOCTL/IOCTL_READ_REG of a protected PMC_IOU_SLCR register), so the
> loop can issue up to a million EEMI calls, and it hard-codes the wait
> policy inside the controller driver.
> 
> Introduce coarse blocking helpers, zynqmp_pm_wait_mphy_tx_rx_config_ready()
> and zynqmp_pm_wait_sram_init_done(), that take a caller-supplied timeout
> budget and contain the poll loop. The loop is EEMI-specific (legacy
> firmware only exposes the per-read status primitive) so it lives in the
> firmware driver, keeping the UFS driver backend-agnostic: a future
> backend can offload the wait to the platform in a single call without
> touching the controller driver again. The existing per-read primitives stay
> exported, so the current EEMI interface is unchanged.
> 
> The timeout budget remains owned by the UFS driver (the consumer that
> knows the hardware) and is passed down, so EEMI and any future backend
> stay consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
> ---

Do you have any issue with this patch? If not, I would take it via my soc tree.

Thanks,
Michal


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 15:02 [PATCH] firmware: xilinx: ufs: move PHY/SRAM ready polling into the firmware backend Michal Simek
2026-08-11 14:25 ` Sai Krishna Potthuri
2026-08-31  7:19 ` Michal Simek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=891250a6-ae3f-4abe-b58c-92c8b9cb35ee@amd.com \
    --to=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=ajay.neeli@amd.com \
    --cc=git@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox