From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BE3C433B4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306A961245 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 306A961245 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=GSFcxag/7Qf02Y1PG06Mt57GilqVUdWh+XdNCR+4ktE=; b=NMR4Epc+fC4STlhYTn0mDf0lP Aa9HRr1rPg78uojDgjrhMcdS9id2s+/DAXNTor6ygUmWvSBaUV7JQIzVwFTP9fQX/ioJOQAGwd5Cc eh7TX7rM6bNknsYBisfrxeIR4hgH9BnAt/00zdO57TfmYC6zsfvDfqFaZIKXBN/wntimqJKhsLqCA 22931i+Q2mxCtCD9IKeq/e5Y37SIaSWZ6byzFn6azqWNGbgpDI1jimH70IUSJBF8E1lwmr+mDl+6i +ratJaCjyH5AZ+9iv23fwozv1UNGeSPac1osRjibqnXaH7zOcRaRTvIpOHMun+9Tl/UWd5Th2oW6C kgTH+kQFA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lYUNQ-00A26X-Pp; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:55:50 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lYUNO-00A269-5R for linux-arm-kernel@desiato.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:55:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=XKjbqgEpi2SlcsOaKtWJBqLEYB82iXVpqaPcS59RODQ=; b=Th6lnlfGi64f7nx3C0OHa33z/d nph5Q5ihUSrdbhoDk5pBJCpn9d4Ap0RssptmEG+LisIO+y5mnv0J2+qj0NJNaCu94bKfdeFiZVdSw 2DXgGdJ9neo2uV2f3xiKxnbZTxPc+XM8EgNEydmn3Seijj4Vsm53t+Ltj5S40jQsSMHFv8ZorZzDO iSVDuFvPa5++BlU+0XeVpcJ6arfPzf9giMJ7OIFEm3opqppYQbRdjH1jsPfr1YWdha5/xDpm5KllK a/2KTBnGvaaCWdYDIQLvSyquwbtcleuiwgo0gY4Pe3RQyoVvqKddLRA0f/xPIupxEctdCv1Sm65fK tZCDEwFw==; Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lYUNJ-00BQGm-72 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:55:44 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13JDtcnT120107; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:55:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1618840538; bh=XKjbqgEpi2SlcsOaKtWJBqLEYB82iXVpqaPcS59RODQ=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=dm0lkFEkgNYd0EHaTvcsXsQ6o4ARTAsNr0okK5GyyBfog5W7HE1m/lmqgXj14a37T mWIiK+4vOh8UiTcepImFarucJkyb87oZdUhNedHE+HDxd/gOSL0joAZcxjukCWiMlt 6+fiuYCmV1ts5Ao38g4p2lMIlpB7PS/+PNXSVk6k= Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (dlee107.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.37]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13JDtceU068477 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:55:38 -0500 Received: from DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:55:37 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:55:37 -0500 Received: from [10.250.33.21] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 13JDtb6Q062385; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:55:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Update bindings for AM64x SoCs To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring CC: Lokesh Vutla , , , , References: <20210327143117.1840-1-s-anna@ti.com> <20210327143117.1840-2-s-anna@ti.com> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <8948a30c-1a2f-1fb0-05bb-37be9c02c5d5@ti.com> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:55:37 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210327143117.1840-2-s-anna@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210419_065541_394146_E3E9744F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, On 3/27/21 9:31 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > The K3 AM64x SoCs have two dual-core Arm R5F clusters/subsystems, with > 2 R5F cores each, both in the MAIN voltage domain. > > These clusters are a revised IP version compared to those present on > J721E and J7200 SoCs, and supports a new "Single-CPU" mode instead of > LockStep mode. Update the K3 R5F remoteproc bindings with the compatible > info relevant to these R5F clusters/subsystems on K3 AM64x SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > --- > v2: No changes > > .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml | 31 ++++++++++++++++--- Looks like this patch has fallen through the cracks, can you please review and give your ack for this patch so that Bjorn can pick up the series for 5.13? regards Suman > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml > index d905d614502b..130fbaacc4b1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml > @@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ description: | > processor subsystems/clusters (R5FSS). The dual core cluster can be used > either in a LockStep mode providing safety/fault tolerance features or in a > Split mode providing two individual compute cores for doubling the compute > - capacity. These are used together with other processors present on the SoC > - to achieve various system level goals. > + capacity on most SoCs. These are used together with other processors present > + on the SoC to achieve various system level goals. > + > + AM64x SoCs do not support LockStep mode, but rather a new non-safety mode > + called "Single-CPU" mode, where only Core0 is used, but with ability to use > + Core1's TCMs as well. > > Each Dual-Core R5F sub-system is represented as a single DTS node > representing the cluster, with a pair of child DT nodes representing > @@ -33,6 +37,7 @@ properties: > - ti,am654-r5fss > - ti,j721e-r5fss > - ti,j7200-r5fss > + - ti,am64-r5fss > > power-domains: > description: | > @@ -56,11 +61,12 @@ properties: > > ti,cluster-mode: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 > - enum: [0, 1] > description: | > Configuration Mode for the Dual R5F cores within the R5F cluster. > - Should be either a value of 1 (LockStep mode) or 0 (Split mode), > - default is LockStep mode if omitted. > + Should be either a value of 1 (LockStep mode) or 0 (Split mode) on > + most SoCs (AM65x, J721E, J7200), default is LockStep mode if omitted; > + and should be either a value of 0 (Split mode) or 2 (Single-CPU mode) > + on AM64x SoCs, default is Split mode if omitted. > > # R5F Processor Child Nodes: > # ========================== > @@ -97,6 +103,7 @@ patternProperties: > - ti,am654-r5f > - ti,j721e-r5f > - ti,j7200-r5f > + - ti,am64-r5f > > reg: > items: > @@ -198,6 +205,20 @@ patternProperties: > > unevaluatedProperties: false > > +if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - ti,am64-r5fss > +then: > + properties: > + ti,cluster-mode: > + enum: [0, 2] > +else: > + properties: > + ti,cluster-mode: > + enum: [0, 1] > + > required: > - compatible > - power-domains > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel