From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: kajoljain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
acme@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
will@kernel.org, james.clark@arm.com, mike.leach@linaro.org,
leo.yan@linaro.org, yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com,
renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com,
ravi.bangoria@amd.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] Clean up perf mem
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:08:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bfadc86-e137-4a9f-a9ce-0bc62464c195@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <befb6acd-86be-4255-af96-38865affc56c@linux.intel.com>
Hi Kajol Jain
On 2023-12-19 9:15 a.m., Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-12-19 4:26 a.m., kajoljain wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was trying to test this patchset on powerpc.
>>
>> After applying it on top of acme's perf-tools-next branch, I am getting
>> below error:
>>
>> INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
>> INSTALL libperf_headers
>> INSTALL libsymbol_headers
>> INSTALL libapi_headers
>> INSTALL libbpf_headers
>> CC arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.o
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c:3:
>> arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h:5:52: error: ‘PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX’
>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>> 5 | extern struct perf_mem_event
>> perf_mem_events_power[PERF_MEM_EVENTS__MAX];
>> |
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> make[6]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:105:
>> arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.o] Error 1
>> make[5]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: util]
>> Error 2
>> make[4]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: powerpc]
>> Error 2
>> make[3]: *** [/home/kajol/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:158: arch]
>> Error 2
>> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:693: perf-in.o] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:251: sub-make] Error 2
>> make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
>>
>> It seems some headerfiles are missing from arch/powerpc/util/mem-
>> events.c
>>
>
> Leo updated the headerfiles for ARM. https://termbin.com/0dkn
>
> I guess powerpc has to do the same thing. Could you please try the below
> patch?
Does the patch work on powerpc?
Thanks,
Kan
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
> b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
> index 72a6ac2b52f5..765d4a054b0a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -#include "map_symbol.h"
> +#include "util/map_symbol.h"
> +#include "util/mem-events.h"
> #include "mem-events.h"
>
> #define E(t, n, s, l, a) { .tag = t, .name = n, .event_name = s, .ldlat
> = l, .aux_event = a }
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
>> Thanks,
>> Kajol Jain
>>
>> On 12/14/23 01:21, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Changes since V2:
>>> - Fix the Arm64 building error (Leo)
>>> - Add two new patches to clean up perf_mem_events__record_args()
>>> and perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus() (Leo)
>>>
>>> Changes since V1:
>>> - Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
>>> - Fix "/," typo (Ian)
>>> - Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
>>> - Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
>>> (Arnaldo)
>>> - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi
>>>
>>> As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@linux.intel.com/
>>>
>>> Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
>>> perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
>>> ARCH specific ones.
>>> Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().
>>>
>>> Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
>>> mem-events.c for each ARCH.
>>>
>>> There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
>>> etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
>>> Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.
>>>
>>> Here are the test results:
>>> Intel hybrid machine:
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -e list
>>> ldlat-loads : available
>>> ldlat-stores : available
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -v
>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>>
>>> Intel SPR:
>>> $perf mem record -e list
>>> ldlat-loads : available
>>> ldlat-stores : available
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -v
>>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>>> calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>> Kan Liang (7):
>>> perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
>>> perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
>>> perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
>>> perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
>>> perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()
>>> perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__record_args()
>>> perf mem: Clean up perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus()
>>>
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm/util/pmu.c | 3 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.c | 39 +---
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.h | 7 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c | 13 +-
>>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h | 7 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c | 11 ++
>>> tools/perf/arch/s390/util/pmu.c | 3 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c | 99 ++--------
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.h | 10 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/pmu.c | 19 +-
>>> tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c | 45 ++---
>>> tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 48 ++---
>>> tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 217 +++++++++++++---------
>>> tools/perf/util/mem-events.h | 19 +-
>>> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 4 +-
>>> tools/perf/util/pmu.h | 7 +
>>> tools/perf/util/pmus.c | 6 -
>>> tools/perf/util/pmus.h | 1 -
>>> 18 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 280 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.h
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.h
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-02 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 19:51 [PATCH V3 0/7] Clean up perf mem kan.liang
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 1/7] perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu kan.liang
2023-12-19 8:48 ` kajoljain
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 2/7] perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr() kan.liang
2024-01-16 13:22 ` kajoljain
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 3/7] perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name() kan.liang
2024-01-16 13:58 ` kajoljain
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 4/7] perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported() kan.liang
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 5/7] perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event() kan.liang
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 6/7] perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__record_args() kan.liang
2023-12-13 19:51 ` [PATCH V3 7/7] perf mem: Clean up perf_pmus__num_mem_pmus() kan.liang
2023-12-16 3:29 ` [PATCH V3 0/7] Clean up perf mem Leo Yan
2023-12-19 9:26 ` kajoljain
2023-12-19 14:15 ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-02 20:08 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-01-05 6:38 ` kajoljain
2024-01-05 14:38 ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-16 14:05 ` kajoljain
2024-01-16 16:37 ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-23 5:30 ` kajoljain
2024-01-23 5:56 ` Thomas Richter
2024-01-23 14:36 ` Liang, Kan
2024-01-07 4:08 ` Leo Yan
2024-01-09 14:01 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bfadc86-e137-4a9f-a9ce-0bc62464c195@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuhaixin.yhx@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).