From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:45:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bff076f-0c82-49e3-8e63-15dfedde233e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b39ce0e3-5d44-4334-b739-2af07a24a668@arm.com>
On 16/06/2025 11:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Steven
>
> On 11/06/2025 11:48, Steven Price wrote:
>> The RMM owns the stage 2 page tables for a realm, and KVM must request
>> that the RMM creates/destroys entries as necessary. The physical pages
>> to store the page tables are delegated to the realm as required, and can
>> be undelegated when no longer used.
>>
>> Creating new RTTs is the easy part, tearing down is a little more
>> tricky. The result of realm_rtt_destroy() can be used to effectively
>> walk the tree and destroy the entries (undelegating pages that were
>> given to the realm).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>
> A couple of minor nits below. Should have spotted earlier, apologies.
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> index 73261b39f556..0f89295fa59c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,22 @@ static unsigned long rmm_feat_reg0;
>> #define RMM_PAGE_SHIFT 12
>> #define RMM_PAGE_SIZE BIT(RMM_PAGE_SHIFT)
>> +#define RMM_RTT_BLOCK_LEVEL 2
>> +#define RMM_RTT_MAX_LEVEL 3
>> +
>> +/* See ARM64_HW_PGTABLE_LEVEL_SHIFT() */
>> +#define RMM_RTT_LEVEL_SHIFT(l) \
>> + ((RMM_PAGE_SHIFT - 3) * (4 - (l)) + 3)
>> +#define RMM_L2_BLOCK_SIZE BIT(RMM_RTT_LEVEL_SHIFT(2))
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned long rme_rtt_level_mapsize(int level)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON(level > RMM_RTT_MAX_LEVEL))
>> + return RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
>> +
>> + return (1UL << RMM_RTT_LEVEL_SHIFT(level));
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool rme_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
>> {
>> return !!u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0, feature);
>> @@ -82,6 +98,126 @@ static int free_delegated_granule(phys_addr_t phys)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static void free_rtt(phys_addr_t phys)
>> +{
>> + if (free_delegated_granule(phys))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + kvm_account_pgtable_pages(phys_to_virt(phys), -1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int realm_rtt_destroy(struct realm *realm, unsigned long addr,
>> + int level, phys_addr_t *rtt_granule,
>> + unsigned long *next_addr)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long out_rtt;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rmi_rtt_destroy(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), addr, level,
>> + &out_rtt, next_addr);
>> +
>> + *rtt_granule = out_rtt;
>> +
>> + return ret;
>
> ultra minor nit: this could simply be :
>
> return rmi_rtt_destroy(virt_to_phys(realm->rd), addr, level,
> rtt_granule, next_addr);
>
Sadly it can't because of the types. We want to return a phys_addr_t for
the granule to undelegate. But the rmi_xxx calls use 'unsigned long' for
consistency. So this is actually a type conversion.
I did toy around with pushing the types up or down but it makes the code
more ugly. Explicitly casting 'works' but is fragile because it bakes in
that phys_addr_t is the same type as unsigned long.
> ...
>
>> +
>> +static int realm_tear_down_rtt_range(struct realm *realm,
>> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> +{
>
> minor nit: Is it worth adding a comment here, why we start from
> start_level + 1 and downwards ? Something like:
>
> /*
> * Root level RTTs can only be destroyed after the RD is
> * destroyed. So tear down everything below the root level.
> */
Ack
> Similarly, we may be able to clarify a comment in kvm_free_stage2_pgd()
Ack, I'll use the wording you suggested in your later email.
Thanks,
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 10:47 [PATCH v9 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH v9 01/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH v9 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 03/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 04/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 05/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 06/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:29 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 07/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2025-06-16 10:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-23 13:17 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 08/43] kvm: arm64: Don't expose debug capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 09/43] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:38 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down Steven Price
2025-06-16 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price [this message]
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2025-06-25 9:00 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-27 10:37 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 12/43] KVM: arm64: vgic: Provide helper for number of list registers Steven Price
2025-07-01 10:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:41 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-01 10:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-03 13:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-09 14:42 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 14/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:42 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-09 14:49 ` Joey Gouly
2025-07-09 15:29 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2025-06-17 12:16 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-17 12:56 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-18 12:33 ` Andre Przywara
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-07-02 0:37 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-09 14:42 ` Steven Price
2025-07-10 5:24 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 16/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2025-06-25 1:45 ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-07-02 0:41 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 17/43] arm64: RME: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2025-07-02 0:44 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 18/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2025-08-01 1:56 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-13 9:30 ` Steven Price
2025-08-14 16:26 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-15 15:48 ` Steven Price
2025-08-15 18:18 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-16 1:56 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2025-06-16 11:55 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-23 16:04 ` Steven Price
2025-07-02 1:04 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 22/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2025-06-24 15:10 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 23/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 24/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 25/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 26/43] arm64: RME: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 27/43] arm64: RME: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 28/43] arm64: RME: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2025-06-24 12:50 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 29/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 30/43] arm64: RME: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 31/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 32/43] arm64: RME: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 33/43] arm64: RME: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 34/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2025-07-24 10:20 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 35/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 36/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2025-07-24 10:47 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 37/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 38/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 39/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 41/43] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2025-06-12 15:14 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-12 15:32 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 42/43] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2025-06-25 1:51 ` [PATCH v9 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-06-27 10:37 ` Steven Price
2025-07-04 4:58 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bff076f-0c82-49e3-8e63-15dfedde233e@arm.com \
--to=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).