public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Force SSBS on context switch
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:28:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c89dbc4-50ba-6802-e582-d4fe54426261@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722135309.43186-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

On 7/22/19 7:23 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On a CPU that doesn't support SSBS, PSTATE[12] is RES0.  In a system
> where only some of the CPUs implement SSBS, we end-up losing track of
> the SSBS bit across task migration.
>
> To address this issue, let's force the SSBS bit on context switch.
>
> Fixes: 8f04e8e6e29c ("arm64: ssbd: Add support for PSTATE.SSBS rather than trapping to EL3")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
>   arch/arm64/kernel/process.c        | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index fd5b1a4efc70..844e2964b0f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -193,6 +193,16 @@ static inline void start_thread_common(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc)
>   		regs->pmr_save = GIC_PRIO_IRQON;
>   }
>   
> +static inline void set_ssbs_bit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	regs->pstate |= PSR_SSBS_BIT;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_compat_ssbs_bit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	regs->pstate |= PSR_AA32_SSBS_BIT;
> +}
> +
>   static inline void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
>   				unsigned long sp)
>   {
> @@ -200,7 +210,7 @@ static inline void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
>   	regs->pstate = PSR_MODE_EL0t;
>   
>   	if (arm64_get_ssbd_state() != ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE)
> -		regs->pstate |= PSR_SSBS_BIT;
> +		set_ssbs_bit(regs);
>   
>   	regs->sp = sp;
>   }
> @@ -219,7 +229,7 @@ static inline void compat_start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
>   #endif
>   
>   	if (arm64_get_ssbd_state() != ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE)
> -		regs->pstate |= PSR_AA32_SSBS_BIT;
> +		set_compat_ssbs_bit(regs);
>   
>   	regs->compat_sp = sp;
>   }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> index 9856395ccdb7..036aa301d97d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long stack_start,
>   			childregs->pstate |= PSR_UAO_BIT;
>   
>   		if (arm64_get_ssbd_state() == ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_DISABLE)
> -			childregs->pstate |= PSR_SSBS_BIT;
> +			set_ssbs_bit(childregs);
>   
>   		if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
>   			childregs->pmr_save = GIC_PRIO_IRQON;
> @@ -442,6 +442,20 @@ void uao_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static void ssbs_thread_switch(struct task_struct *next)
> +{
> +	if (likely(!(next->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) &&
> +	    arm64_get_ssbd_state() != ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_ENABLE &&
> +	    !test_tsk_thread_flag(next, TIF_SSBD)) {
> +		struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(next);
> +
> +		if (compat_user_mode(regs))
> +			set_compat_ssbs_bit(regs);
> +		else if (user_mode(regs))
> +			set_ssbs_bit(regs);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * We store our current task in sp_el0, which is clobbered by userspace. Keep a
>    * shadow copy so that we can restore this upon entry from userspace.
> @@ -471,6 +485,7 @@ __notrace_funcgraph struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
>   	entry_task_switch(next);
>   	uao_thread_switch(next);
>   	ptrauth_thread_switch(next);
> +	ssbs_thread_switch(next);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Complete any pending TLB or cache maintenance on this CPU in case

Looks good to me.


Thanks

Neeraj

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22 13:53 [PATCH v2] arm64: Force SSBS on context switch Marc Zyngier
2019-07-22 14:58 ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
2019-07-22 16:04   ` Will Deacon
2019-07-22 16:32     ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2019-07-22 16:41     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c89dbc4-50ba-6802-e582-d4fe54426261@codeaurora.org \
    --to=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox