From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/34] cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:54:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d083bb5c2d167aa0b52f48c3f17a1320b3e0249.1376619363.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1376619363.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code and so this patch
introduces another flag: CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION, which will be set by such
drivers.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-cris-kernel at axis.com
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: sparclinux at vger.kernel.org
Cc: spear-devel at list.st.com
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a7a1d3e..2782949 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1673,6 +1673,9 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
else if (cpufreq_driver->target_index) {
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
+ struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool notify;
int index;
freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(policy->cpu);
@@ -1691,7 +1694,38 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (freq_table[index].frequency == policy->cur)
return 0;
+ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+ notify = !(cpufreq_driver->flags | CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION);
+ read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
+ freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
+
+ pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
+ __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
+ freqs.new);
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
+ }
+
retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
+ if (retval)
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
+ __func__, retval);
+
+ if (notify) {
+ /*
+ * Notify with old freq in case we failed to change
+ * frequency
+ */
+ if (retval)
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
+
+ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
+ CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+ }
}
return retval;
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index ff9c8df..62ce478 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -221,6 +221,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
* frequency transitions */
#define CPUFREQ_PM_NO_WARN 0x04 /* don't warn on suspend/resume speed
* mismatches */
+/*
+ * Driver will call cpufreq_notify_transition() in its target_index() routine
+ * and so cpufreq core must not call it. Only useful for drivers that implement
+ * target_index(), unused otherwise.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION 0x08
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 2:24 [PATCH 00/34] CPUFreq: Move freq change notifications out of drivers Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:24 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2013-08-16 2:24 ` [PATCH 02/34] cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAOLK0pz7e8nQVnZY0a-j_Fd_kFOqF8ZS4tRfYw1S+25Lv8GoFQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAOLK0pyVDSc6x1u8Ro6ng1dH8ELqc3P9jPHamgiXBn6sWDgm8w@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-16 7:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 15:30 ` Lan Tianyu
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 03/34] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 04/34] cpufreq: at32ap: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 5:58 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 05/34] cpufreq: blackfin: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 06/34] cpufreq: cpu0: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: " Viresh Kumar
2017-10-10 7:57 ` Jesper Nilsson
2017-10-10 9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 08/34] cpufreq: davinci: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 09/34] cpufreq: dbx500: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 10/34] cpufreq: e_powersaver: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 11/34] cpufreq: elanfreq: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 12/34] cpufreq: exynos: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 13/34] cpufreq: exynos5440: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag Viresh Kumar
2013-08-18 10:54 ` amit daniel kachhap
2013-08-18 21:57 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-08-19 3:42 ` amit daniel kachhap
2013-08-19 4:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 14/34] cpufreq: ia64-acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 15/34] cpufreq: imx6q: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 16/34] cpufreq: kirkwood: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 17/34] cpufreq: longhaul: set CPUFREQ_NO_NOTIFICATION flag Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 18/34] cpufreq: loongson2: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition() Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 19/34] cpufreq: maple: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 20/34] cpufreq: omap: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 21/34] cpufreq: p4-clockmod: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 22/34] cpufreq: pasemi: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 23/34] cpufreq: pmac: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 24/34] cpufreq: powernow: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 25/34] cpufreq: ppc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 26/34] cpufreq: pxa: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 27/34] cpufreq: s3c: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 28/34] cpufreq: s5pv210: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 29/34] cpufreq: sa11x0: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 30/34] cpufreq: sc520: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 31/34] cpufreq: sparc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 32/34] cpufreq: SPEAr: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 33/34] cpufreq: speedstep: " Viresh Kumar
2013-08-16 2:25 ` [PATCH 34/34] cpufreq: tegra: " Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d083bb5c2d167aa0b52f48c3f17a1320b3e0249.1376619363.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).