linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andy Yan" <andyshrk@163.com>
To: "Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
Cc: "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Sandy Huang" <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
	"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	kernel@collabora.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"FUKAUMI Naoki" <naoki@radxa.com>,
	"Algea Cao" <algea.cao@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop2: Improve display modes handling on RK3588 HDMI0
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:36:21 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8dff095.1555.193d768ad5e.Coremail.andyshrk@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ba24dc6-b6e7-4964-af84-a5374903ce36@collabora.com>


Hi,

在 2024-12-18 00:59:57,"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> 写道:
>On 12/17/24 6:53 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> On 12/17/24 5:00 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 07:01:15PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2024, 18:47:44 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 06:23:03PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2024, 18:07:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:15:07PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The RK3588 specific implementation is currently quite limited in terms
>>>>>>>>> of handling the full range of display modes supported by the connected
>>>>>>>>> screens, e.g. 2560x1440@75Hz, 2048x1152@60Hz, 1024x768@60Hz are just a
>>>>>>>>> few of them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Additionally, it doesn't cope well with non-integer refresh rates like
>>>>>>>>> 59.94, 29.97, 23.98, etc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Make use of HDMI0 PHY PLL as a more accurate DCLK source to handle
>>>>>>>>> all display modes up to 4K@60Hz.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tested-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>>>>>>>>> index 8b2f53ffefdbf1cc8737b3a86e630a03a7fd9348..393fe6aa170aaee9663c4a6d98c1cd6a5ef79392 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
>>>>>>>>> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ struct vop2_video_port {
>>>>>>>>>  	struct drm_crtc crtc;
>>>>>>>>>  	struct vop2 *vop2;
>>>>>>>>>  	struct clk *dclk;
>>>>>>>>> +	struct clk *dclk_src;
>>>>>>>>>  	unsigned int id;
>>>>>>>>>  	const struct vop2_video_port_data *data;
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> @@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ struct vop2 {
>>>>>>>>>  	struct clk *hclk;
>>>>>>>>>  	struct clk *aclk;
>>>>>>>>>  	struct clk *pclk;
>>>>>>>>> +	struct clk *pll_hdmiphy0;
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  	/* optional internal rgb encoder */
>>>>>>>>>  	struct rockchip_rgb *rgb;
>>>>>>>>> @@ -220,6 +222,8 @@ struct vop2 {
>>>>>>>>>  	struct vop2_win win[];
>>>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> +#define VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE		600000 /* kHz */
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>  #define vop2_output_if_is_hdmi(x)	((x) == ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI0 || \
>>>>>>>>>  					 (x) == ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI1)
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> @@ -1033,6 +1037,9 @@ static void vop2_crtc_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  	vop2_crtc_disable_irq(vp, VP_INT_DSP_HOLD_VALID);
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> +	if (vp->dclk_src)
>>>>>>>>> +		clk_set_parent(vp->dclk, vp->dclk_src);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(vp->dclk);
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  	vop2->enable_count--;
>>>>>>>>> @@ -2049,6 +2056,27 @@ static void vop2_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  	vop2_vp_write(vp, RK3568_VP_MIPI_CTRL, 0);
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> +	/*
>>>>>>>>> +	 * Switch to HDMI PHY PLL as DCLK source for display modes up
>>>>>>>>> +	 * to 4K@60Hz, if available, otherwise keep using the system CRU.
>>>>>>>>> +	 */
>>>>>>>>> +	if (vop2->pll_hdmiphy0 && mode->crtc_clock <= VOP2_MAX_DCLK_RATE) {
>>>>>>>>> +		drm_for_each_encoder_mask(encoder, crtc->dev, crtc_state->encoder_mask) {
>>>>>>>>> +			struct rockchip_encoder *rkencoder = to_rockchip_encoder(encoder);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +			if (rkencoder->crtc_endpoint_id == ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_HDMI0) {
>>>>>>>>> +				if (!vp->dclk_src)
>>>>>>>>> +					vp->dclk_src = clk_get_parent(vp->dclk);
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +				ret = clk_set_parent(vp->dclk, vop2->pll_hdmiphy0);
>>>>>>>>> +				if (ret < 0)
>>>>>>>>> +					drm_warn(vop2->drm,
>>>>>>>>> +						 "Could not switch to HDMI0 PHY PLL: %d\n", ret);
>>>>>>>>> +				break;
>>>>>>>>> +			}
>>>>>>>>> +		}
>>>>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems pretty fragile to do it at atomic_enable time, even more so
>>>>>>>> since you don't lock the parent either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any reason not to do it in the DRM or clock driver probe, and make sure
>>>>>>>> you never change the parent somehow?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On rk3588 we have 3 dclk_s and 2 hdmi controllers. Each video-port can
>>>>>>> use the clock generated from either the hdmi0phy or hdmi1phy, depending
>>>>>>> on which hdmi-controller it uses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you actually need to know which vpX will output to which hdmiY to then
>>>>>>> reparent that dclk to the hdmiphy output.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Rockchip nomenclature isn't super obvious to me, sorry. Is there a
>>>>>> datasheet for this somewhere? Also, does this vpX -> HDMI-Y mapping need
>>>>>> to be dynamic?
>>>>>
>>>>> VPs are CRTCs in drm-language and each of them can drive a differing
>>>>> number of output encoders. Those video-ports also have differing output
>>>>> characteristics in terms of supported resolution and other properties.
>>>>>
>>>>> The rk3588 TRM has leaked in a number of places, and if you find a
>>>>> TRM-part2, there is a section labeled "Display Output Interface Description"
>>>>> that has a nice graphic for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Or in short:
>>>>> - CRTC(VP)0 supports 8K resolution and can drive DP0+1, HDMI0+1, eDP0+1
>>>>>   [if I'm reading things correctly, 8K together with CRTC1 somehow)
>>>>> - CRTC(VP)1 supports 4K resolution and can drive DP0+1, HDMI0+1, eDP0+1
>>>>> - CRTC(VP)2 supports 4K resolution and can drive DP0+1, HDMI0+1, eDP01, DSI0+1
>>>>> - CRTC(VP)3 supports 2K resolution and can drive DSI0+1 and some BT1120,BT656
>>>>>
>>>>> so for the 3 higher resolution CRTCs there are essentially 6 or 8 output options
>>>>> depending on the board design
>>>>
>>>> That's much clearer, thanks. I'm not entirely sure how that links to the
>>>> need for the PLL to change its parent depending on the ouput. Do you
>>>> need to always have all the outputs on the same PLL?
>>>
>>> One of the problems is that the PHY PLLs cannot be used as clock sources
>>> for resolutions above 4K@60Hz, while VOP2 on RK3588 supports up to 8K@60Hz,
>>> which is supposed to be handled by the system CRU.
>> 
>> But can that system CRU drive resolutions lower than 4k@60? If so, why
>> do we bother with PHYs?
>
>It can, but it's not accurate enough to support all modes, e.g. those
>having fractional refresh rates, among others.  That's actually the
>reason we'd want to make use of the PHY PLLs.

Not only that. For resolutions lower than 4k@60, if we use system cur as dclk parent,
it can't  sync with HDMI TMDS clock , this could lead to stability/compatibility i issues,
which may not be easy to encounter, but we have indeed experienced them  few timems
in a large amount of productization practice.

>
>>> Moreover, the 2 PLLs are shared between 3 out of the 4 video ports already
>>> mentioned by Heiko.  There is quite a bit of complexity in downstream
>>> driver to handle all possible usecases - see [1] for a brief description on
>>> how was that designed to work.
>> 
>> That's a generic allocation issue. Multiple drivers (vc4 for example)
>> has this issue for other components. It can be fairly easily dealt with
>> at atomic_check time.
>> 
>> Maxime
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11 10:15 [PATCH v2 0/5] Improve Rockchip VOP2 display modes handling on RK3588 HDMI0 Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: display: vop2: Add optional PLL clock properties Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/rockchip: vop2: Drop unnecessary if_pixclk_rate computation Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop2: Improve display modes handling on RK3588 HDMI0 Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 17:07   ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-11 17:23     ` Heiko Stübner
2024-12-11 17:47       ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-11 18:01         ` Heiko Stübner
2024-12-17 15:00           ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-17 16:36             ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-17 16:53               ` Maxime Ripard
2024-12-17 16:59                 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-18  1:36                   ` Andy Yan [this message]
2025-01-08 22:27                     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable HDMI0 PHY clk provider on RK3588 Cristian Ciocaltea
2024-12-11 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add HDMI0 PHY PLL clock source to VOP2 " Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8dff095.1555.193d768ad5e.Coremail.andyshrk@163.com \
    --to=andyshrk@163.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=algea.cao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=hjc@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=naoki@radxa.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).