From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687ABC77B61 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:21:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=eTtrN4Heup8j4PJsUy9eJSpNfVlRsm2YLv6BcWEzDNM=; b=kC5sgzFnBhm00u 9IBSFfMgnCnTirkT0MeC6pYA2m/a1WmK983rthkR/7Q6vmqhQ9ZcySbyUaXG/Hh0EonpqR+KLkiOF UADoXGlOs8Vpa5NR+kWNbIwjrm9E8Td3Ryoi0EVHwOVm8gQRz/z2EENOOHqi/Y05IMLpGhLUQ5gKX zvVPyEt5zpJJLLF+dHJOncaVEVpA3fMG+fX3wrTCMjzM69rPJI7J3vTm8kT3dQAztdZzQ/G86sziq GqWhLPkUmGrVMcu+zlF54J94QK4QGtmWitTiORN1Ch1L+/c9SrDaSGbZ1d8iiq0rRMcQ8zAsZMlNt unmqYWJA8cxJAHMvpI5A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1prykP-006BEN-1J; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:21:09 +0000 Received: from out-25.mta0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:1004:224b::19]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1prykM-006B8p-13 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:21:08 +0000 Message-ID: <8e2050f5-6476-9048-c33e-100a039ba3b4@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1682590861; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3G/nU0Px8/ejhPGbb3UsW4rMKbAM1zhRCr8M1g7gDu8=; b=vpfCP46wVmNuM7i3ys2EAxtFKDkH0nL1eUxxHAyOEFkPwDO2wMaXZBx3sCd9AoycwYIABN 8ZqZfRdC+iE3csaYeiQy7ZFY8qSbhzl4jQhV8k6LElEWNx766B29jpn94BPlGWHEpcKWJ2 Ddf8s0uIFh0SItF7hYKU+td2M2O7p54= Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:20:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v6 2/6] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions Content-Language: en-US To: Paolo Abeni , Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Pirko Cc: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" , Jonathan Lemon , poros , mschmidt , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20230312022807.278528-1-vadfed@meta.com> <20230312022807.278528-3-vadfed@meta.com> <2b749045-021e-d6c8-b265-972cfa892802@linux.dev> <20230403111812.163b7d1d@kernel.org> <20230410153149.602c6bad@kernel.org> <20230417124942.4305abfa@kernel.org> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Vadim Fedorenko In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230427_032107_176480_887D9D62 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.18 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 27/04/2023 09:05, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 12:49 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> [resend with fixed CC list] >> >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 18:23:15 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >>>> What is index? I thought you don't want an index and yet there is one, >>>> just scoped by random attributes :( >>> >>> Index internal within a single instance. Like Intel guys, they have 1 >>> clock wired up with multiple DPLLs. The driver gives every DPLL index. >>> This is internal, totally up to the driver decision. Similar concept to >>> devlink port index. >> >> devlink port index ended up as a pretty odd beast with drivers encoding >> various information into it, using locally grown schemes. >> >> Hard no on doing that in dpll, it should not be exposed to the user. > > I'm replying here just in case the even the above reply was lost. > > I guess the last remark resolved this specific discussion. > > @Vadim, @Arkadiusz, even if net-next is currently closed, there are no > restrictions for RFC patches: feel free to share v7 when it fits you > better! Hi Paolo! Thanks for reminder, the new version is almost ready, I was a bit distracted by other burning issues. Hopefully I'll publish it till the end of the week. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel