From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AFDC5DF60 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4202084D for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="t12Zokck" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DC4202084D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=svUqOKS3U3Tiy6CyYWuYm6Yww4tZZSZFYzDVXoIif6k=; b=t12ZokckiydN/QzfNOoPgMOg2 8DaQL/t+pp6TqWa3tFLXEj67jqdK+OfjRN2YV9a0yffOo5xD6/fC8dLPhlLjhwTzCVIdLrH0gh8iL iw8OITP71YatM0UryosqCbbho1YjRaqJzbVFAIF4PJu3FJV1Hmj36t9jniuFdnY5v8rR+ph3EQ9Er eOkelj2poZF5fMCGG4cpwbPh+lwwaovQiXEZmMOZUOJwIwlirp1FmMRgBTETvgIb8No41sQ77GPED 7mychtE9v9lU/eIhRi9Nq5VPeTwKXKJvT2ShONSBvaxArex4qrqEk7pB7pdBYPZolYEeUIu58nOIq ysthiVj3w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iS59P-00084O-GZ; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:10:03 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iS59L-0007zi-1q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 20:10:00 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB28C64F; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:09:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.162.40.121] (a075563-lin.blr.arm.com [10.162.40.121]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02C4E3FB2A; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:50:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/8] ftrace: add ftrace_init_nop() To: Mark Rutland References: <20191029165832.33606-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20191029165832.33606-2-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20191104133657.GE45140@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> From: Amit Kachhap Message-ID: <8e68de1f-f961-752d-9c07-ce41ce624d35@arm.com> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:17:26 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191104133657.GE45140@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191105_120959_185822_D2B3137A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jthierry@redhat.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, deller@gmx.de, jpoimboe@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com, jeyu@kernel.org, svens@stackframe.org, duwe@suse.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On 11/4/19 7:06 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 05:49:00PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> Hi Mark, > > Hi Amit, > > Thanks for the review! > >> On 10/29/19 10:28 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> Architectures may need to perform special initialization of ftrace >>> callsites, and today they do so by special-casing ftrace_make_nop() when >>> the expected branch address is MCOUNT_ADDR. In some cases (e.g. for >>> patchable-function-entry), we don't have an mcount-like symbol and don't >> s/an mcount/a mcount. >>> want a synthetic MCOUNT_ADDR, but we may need to perform some >>> initialization of callsites. >>> >>> To make it possible to separate initialization from runtime >>> modification, and to handle cases without an mcount-like symbol, this >> Same as above. > > Using 'an' in both of these cases is correct, even though 'mcount' > starts with a consonant, since it's pronounced as-if it were 'emcount'. > I will leave this as-is. Ok sure. It makes sense. > >>> patch adds an optional ftrace_init_nop() function that architectures can >>> implement, which does not pass a branch address. >>> >>> Where an architecture does not provide ftrace_init_nop(), we will fall >>> back to the existing behaviour of calling ftrace_make_nop() with >>> MCOUNT_ADDR. >>> >>> At the same time, ftrace_code_disable() is renamed to >>> ftrace_nop_initialize() to make it clearer that it is intended to >>> intialize a callsite into a disabled state, and is not for disabling a >>> callsite that has been runtime enabled. The kerneldoc description of rec >>> arguments is updated to cover non-mcount callsites. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland >>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel >>> Cc: Ingo Molnar >>> Cc: Steven Rostedt >>> Cc: Torsten Duwe >>> --- >>> include/linux/ftrace.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 6 +++--- >>> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h >>> index 8a8cb3c401b2..9867d90d635e 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h >>> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static inline int ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller(void) { return 0; } >>> /** >>> * ftrace_make_nop - convert code into nop >>> * @mod: module structure if called by module load initialization >>> - * @rec: the mcount call site record >>> + * @rec: the call site record (e.g. mcount/fentry) >>> * @addr: the address that the call site should be calling >>> * >>> * This is a very sensitive operation and great care needs >>> @@ -520,9 +520,38 @@ static inline int ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller(void) { return 0; } >>> extern int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, >>> struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr); >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * ftrace_init_nop - initialize a nop call site >>> + * @mod: module structure if called by module load initialization >>> + * @rec: the call site record (e.g. mcount/fentry) >>> + * >>> + * This is a very sensitive operation and great care needs >>> + * to be taken by the arch. The operation should carefully >>> + * read the location, check to see if what is read is indeed >>> + * what we expect it to be, and then on success of the compare, >>> + * it should write to the location. >>> + * >>> + * The code segment at @rec->ip should contain the contents created by >>> + * the compiler >> Nit: Will it be better to write it as "@rec->ip should store the adjusted >> ftrace entry address of the call site" or something like that. > > This was the specific wording requested by Steve, and it's trying to > describe the instructions at rec->ip, rather than the value of rec->ip, > so I think it's better to leave this as-is. ok Its fine this way too. Actually from the comment, I could not understand which one of the compiler contents this points to as in this case there are 2 nops. > >>> + * >>> + * Return must be: >>> + * 0 on success >>> + * -EFAULT on error reading the location >>> + * -EINVAL on a failed compare of the contents >>> + * -EPERM on error writing to the location >>> + * Any other value will be considered a failure. >>> + */ >>> +#ifndef ftrace_init_nop >>> +static inline int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec) >>> +{ >>> + return ftrace_make_nop(mod, rec, MCOUNT_ADDR); >>> +} >>> +#endif >>> + >> Now that ftrace_init_nop is also an arch implemented function so it may be >> added in Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst along with ftrace_make_nop. >> In general also, adding some description about patchable-function-entry >> in kernel Documentation will be useful. > > I agree that would be a good thing, but as Steve suggests I will leave > this for subsequent rework, as I think that also implies more > rework/renaming in the core code (e.g. to more cleanly separate the > notion of a callsite from mcount specifically). ok. Thanks, Amit > > Steve, if you'd like help with that (or review), I'd be happy to help. > > Thanks, > Mark. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel