From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19950CA5FCE for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 18:14:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8EXPyjCLnT0u6Y3Aw1qgMDaoecca6+CurIO2hSBvPAE=; b=ledb1khcPmIttyqMeCL93jej6B c4xKNcs3JV52ZGgUr0Ee4c8ZsIAQRF1aOXRKTelzZB7xY/l8Exkc7ow1cVVcDI4+dJn2iTj1h7cwk aXpPxLqDilChweFPaufHR8ecsayRd94AKOz2Ry0jYlVMQswBCa1qeP5vWs+pX4Q0X0atQzOdi9Fje 2AuJgpl3H/uemwiGIoCIgkkOu94YTA3PC+E2qx2G4WJKpOyPb/J80NngJZ7+4608U+QblzbITcWIg Cqebi0POYHJXqulpRFrWnKO4RehnIt8Hz76yQ+5H7bPEX/+9yfkbk3ZiwuUdHXAOhsd1MAK8U9iM1 UOUqeeVQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCLIg-00000009xgF-2zs2; Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:14:34 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCLIe-00000009xg5-3SzJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:14:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8F43442; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 18:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFA111F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 18:14:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790878472; bh=8EXPyjCLnT0u6Y3Aw1qgMDaoecca6+CurIO2hSBvPAE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=K0YVCfY2IDUaC4Vt4tc6UsXJc2uHpFjZ8QQVRtHbwXnLVQqg+u5EW9RW5MrX/HhQt aBsJd+I6q0vpz1wNylTgBOsPVkpnW2j+cvZENvcBD/lZ77oY3EszViUH6kkOwBetVZ H9VGfiGECqOwiSeuB2jonVQsYNAMtKKI3/q4s6kzPVf87jTYbNAd4pPl9T4ACPIPek LtFtHRGA6IIl2pBMyHvMWHQMUeqkiMrPxHmN8sH+OuFoedNzkmC7ZM9/iQztEMXzzH NmCq/uXXPLYoUpwEva61QltarOEgoeojcabxt2AbJn61YJxlS/VrguUjw6ri9wGNBX vbDa2ZJ5fJvBQ== Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 19:14:26 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton , Fuad Tabba , Peter Maydell , Leonardo Bras , Wei-Lin Chang , Yao Yuan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 12/15] KVM: selftests: arm64: Add GCS to set_id_regs Message-ID: <8eb4d0f8-3080-4efa-afaf-bbe2a16eaa37@sirena.org.uk> References: <20260930-arm64-gcs-v21-0-3556644cd927@kernel.org> <20260930-arm64-gcs-v21-12-3556644cd927@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hLSHdAw0xQgYgBov" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Do not stamp. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --hLSHdAw0xQgYgBov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 05:38:54PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 10:48:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Now that GCS is configurable via the ID registers update set_id_regs to > > cover ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.GCS. > Should maybe also mention adding the GCS-without-S1PIE test? I'd have said that was part of the coverage the test now has for bitfields TBH. --hLSHdAw0xQgYgBov Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmq+owEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AK6Af8CW+PewA41u22GjCm2K4HWJprbzV/mTkY5qCL0xX8i+fFZwjBEGuDg++l 1WZRIYTi4kqI5ofqkLVG8zllv9dSAW+DXcsH7TJjs5wyZDO9bNqbbBeqFZswxGMh ZYdKcZLYTg7gs9EGJ5eEPyIgNYjjJga9ABn6hZTFsDEM+VKDL7GcjpO6WXW+JPZg cc2IlLt9eQTZcjwpvtnT9xwnHsbCppAuuVqV8tU+ZuTQ94TMixXsDTTltMvolgvB 9ZDUkJtJD9k4vuBdXiyh/UmkgMf+b9hoDlJwshmwjziFwY25asoZUM5LNZcJhC8t E5Dked3ERLcN6MVu6njP5Qxr0XEW5A== =ZnLt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hLSHdAw0xQgYgBov--