From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidb@quicinc.com (David Brown) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:13:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: smp: Select local timers vs dummy timer support runtime In-Reply-To: <1297510187-31547-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:59:43 +0530") References: <1297510187-31547-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1297510187-31547-2-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Message-ID: <8ya1v3aey0c.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Feb 12 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > The current code support of dummy timers in absence of local > timer is compile time. This is an attempt to convert it to runtime > so that on few SOC version if the local timers aren't supported > kernel can switch to dummy timers. OMAP4430 ES1.0 does suffer from > this limitation. > > This patch should not have any functional impact on affected > files. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar > --- > arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c | 3 ++- Acked-By: David Brown -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.