From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown)
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:01:37 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] msm: clock: Remove unused code and definitions
In-Reply-To: <1295992937.25496.75.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (Daniel
	Walker's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:02:17 -0800")
References: <1295927118-27591-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
	<1295927118-27591-2-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
	<1295991537.25496.49.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
	<4D3F4609.3000808@codeaurora.org>
	<1295992937.25496.75.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <8ya1v3z8gu6.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:52 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> On 01/25/2011 01:38 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 19:45 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >> Remove dead code and push out clock-7x30.h and clock-pcom.h to
>> >> where they are actually used.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'd do two patches for this. The stuff your doing is too disconnected.
>> >
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> There is a whole bunch of unused code in the clock files and it's being 
>> deleted. I don't see a point of splitting it up per file.
>
> It's easier to review when changes aren't merged that don't related to
> each other.

In this particular case, the patch is a bunch of removal of dead code,
and kind of makes sense to keep it together.  I'm fine with it as is.

David Brown

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.