From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:20:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] msm: add single-wire serial bus interface (SSBI) driver In-Reply-To: (Dima Zavin's message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:39:48 -0800") References: <1298585954-22422-1-git-send-email-kheitke@codeaurora.org> <1298585954-22422-3-git-send-email-kheitke@codeaurora.org> <1298600621.17118.27.camel@m0nster> <8yad3mgdeut.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1298601346.17118.29.camel@m0nster> Message-ID: <8ya8vx4dcky.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 24 2011, Dima Zavin wrote: > On that note, should we have a "drivers/arm/msm" instead of just > "drivers/msm"? Other non-msm arm sub-arches probably have the same > problem and polluting drivers/ top-level for every arm-subarch maybe > undesirable. I'm moving linux-kernel to the 'to' field, and adding Greg KH to CC. This is about a new driver (ssbi) for the MSM chips, and where the driver for this should go. The driver is specific to MSM chips (as far as I know, the bus is only supported there). There are likely to be future msm-specific drivers, so the suggestion was to put this under drivers/msm, or possibly drivers/arm/msm. Anyone other suggestions, or preferences for the location? Thanks, David Brown