From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: narmstrong@baylibre.com (Neil Armstrong) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:34:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: oxnas: Add OX820 SMP support In-Reply-To: <14513531.isB50DxNJf@wuerfel> References: <20161017084303.20078-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <20161017084303.20078-2-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <14513531.isB50DxNJf@wuerfel> Message-ID: <9124cda0-d16b-0992-2552-8a617aeb5d40@baylibre.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/17/2016 11:06 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, October 17, 2016 10:43:02 AM CEST Neil Armstrong wrote: >> + >> + /* >> + * This is really belt and braces; we hold unintended secondary >> + * CPUs in the holding pen until we're ready for them. However, >> + * since we haven't sent them a soft interrupt, they shouldn't >> + * be there. >> + */ >> + write_pen_release(cpu); >> + >> + /* >> + * Enable GIC cpu interface in CPU Interface Control Register >> + */ >> + writel(GIC_CPU_CTRL_ENABLE, >> + gic_cpu_ctrl + GIC_NCPU_OFFSET(cpu) + GIC_CPU_CTRL); >> + >> + /* >> + * Send the secondary CPU a soft interrupt, thereby causing >> + * the boot monitor to read the system wide flags register, >> + * and branch to the address found there. >> + */ >> + >> + arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu)); >> + timeout = jiffies + (1 * HZ); >> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) { >> + smp_rmb(); >> + if (read_pen_release() == -1) >> + break; >> + >> + udelay(10); >> + } >> > > This seems to have been copied from plat-versatile, but is really > not needed here since you apparently have proper hardware support for > starting up the CPUs. Yes it seems. > > Any reason you can't just write to the cpu_ctrl register > once and keep going without that whole holding_pen loop > and spinlock? I suppose but I did not find any good examples except the plat-versatile code. I will try some simpler code. > > Arnd > Neil