From: "Mika Penttilä" <mpenttil@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:09:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9156d191-9ec4-4422-bae9-2e8ce66f9d5e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821200701.1329277-11-david@redhat.com>
On 8/21/25 23:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> All pages were already initialized and set to PageReserved() with a
> refcount of 1 by MM init code.
Just to be sure, how is this working with MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT, where MM is supposed not to
initialize struct pages?
> In fact, by using __init_single_page(), we will be setting the refcount to
> 1 just to freeze it again immediately afterwards.
>
> So drop the __init_single_page() and use __ClearPageReserved() instead.
> Adjust the comments to highlight that we are dealing with an open-coded
> prep_compound_page() variant.
>
> Further, as we can now safely iterate over all pages in a folio, let's
> avoid the page-pfn dance and just iterate the pages directly.
>
> Note that the current code was likely problematic, but we never ran into
> it: prep_compound_tail() would have been called with an offset that might
> exceed a memory section, and prep_compound_tail() would have simply
> added that offset to the page pointer -- which would not have done the
> right thing on sparsemem without vmemmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index d12a9d5146af4..ae82a845b14ad 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3235,17 +3235,14 @@ static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
> unsigned long start_page_number,
> unsigned long end_page_number)
> {
> - enum zone_type zone = zone_idx(folio_zone(folio));
> - int nid = folio_nid(folio);
> - unsigned long head_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
> - unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = head_pfn + end_page_number;
> + struct page *head_page = folio_page(folio, 0);
> + struct page *page = folio_page(folio, start_page_number);
> + unsigned long i;
> int ret;
>
> - for (pfn = head_pfn + start_page_number; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> - struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> -
> - __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
> - prep_compound_tail((struct page *)folio, pfn - head_pfn);
> + for (i = start_page_number; i < end_page_number; i++, page++) {
> + __ClearPageReserved(page);
> + prep_compound_tail(head_page, i);
> ret = page_ref_freeze(page, 1);
> VM_BUG_ON(!ret);
> }
> @@ -3257,12 +3254,14 @@ static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
> {
> int ret;
>
> - /* Prepare folio head */
> + /*
> + * This is an open-coded prep_compound_page() whereby we avoid
> + * walking pages twice by preparing+freezing them in the same go.
> + */
> __folio_clear_reserved(folio);
> __folio_set_head(folio);
> ret = folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1);
> VM_BUG_ON(!ret);
> - /* Initialize the necessary tail struct pages */
> hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(folio, 1, nr_pages);
> prep_compound_head((struct page *)folio, huge_page_order(h));
> }
--Mika
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250821200701.1329277-1-david@redhat.com>
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 06/35] mm/page_alloc: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in alloc_contig_range_noprof() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:23 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-22 17:07 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 07/35] mm/memremap: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in memremap_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 17:09 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 08/35] mm/hugetlb: check for unreasonable folio sizes when registering hstate David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 09/35] mm/mm_init: make memmap_init_compound() look more like prep_compound_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 15:27 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-22 18:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 4:09 ` Mika Penttilä [this message]
2025-08-22 6:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-23 8:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 14:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 14:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 14:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 15:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 16:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 16:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 16:58 ` update kernel-doc for MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()) Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 18:32 ` update kernel-doc for MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 11/35] mm: sanity-check maximum folio size in folio_set_order() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:36 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 12/35] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:46 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-21 20:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:50 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-24 13:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 13/35] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:55 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-21 21:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 14/35] mm/mm/percpu-km: drop nth_page() usage within single allocation David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 15/35] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 16/35] mm/pagewalk: drop nth_page() usage within folio in folio_walk_start() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 17/35] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage within folio when recording subpages David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 18/35] io_uring/zcrx: remove "struct io_copy_cache" and one nth_page() usage David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 11:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-22 13:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 9:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 19/35] io_uring/zcrx: remove nth_page() usage within folio David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 20/35] mips: mm: convert __flush_dcache_pages() to __flush_dcache_folio_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 21/35] mm/cma: refuse handing out non-contiguous page ranges David Hildenbrand
2025-08-26 10:45 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-08-26 11:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-26 13:03 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-08-26 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-26 13:11 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 22/35] dma-remap: drop nth_page() in dma_common_contiguous_remap() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 8:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 23/35] scatterlist: disallow non-contigous page ranges in a single SG entry David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 8:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 32/35] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage in unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 33/35] kfence: drop nth_page() usage David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 21:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:07 ` [PATCH RFC 34/35] block: update comment of "struct bio_vec" regarding nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:07 ` [PATCH RFC 35/35] mm: remove nth_page() David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <20250821200701.1329277-32-david@redhat.com>
2025-08-21 20:24 ` [PATCH RFC 31/35] crypto: remove nth_page() usage within SG entry Linus Torvalds
2025-08-21 20:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-21 20:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20250821200701.1329277-25-david@redhat.com>
2025-08-22 1:59 ` [PATCH RFC 24/35] ata: libata-eh: drop " Damien Le Moal
2025-08-22 6:18 ` David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <20250821200701.1329277-3-david@redhat.com>
2025-08-22 15:10 ` [PATCH RFC 02/35] arm64: Kconfig: drop superfluous "select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP" Mike Rapoport
[not found] ` <20250821200701.1329277-6-david@redhat.com>
2025-08-22 15:13 ` [PATCH RFC 05/35] wireguard: selftests: remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y from qemu kernel config Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9156d191-9ec4-4422-bae9-2e8ce66f9d5e@redhat.com \
--to=mpenttil@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).