From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82B0C3A59F for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6A221726 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="qCV4CD1O" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7A6A221726 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZZ1FLV2qZSCcXhdoMxg3L8+RZiwONm2RZCJuT9Vc408=; b=qCV4CD1OpYLWlv WVcHJHxz2PatKw3Zh2Ieb4mqkK+OJfrHz9YyhVSZeNu//9FrcEDbioqMhYsFWpcZ2tHNR0iNq7Rjx H6pi1sle00gnx2xCH42c7E4Kwp7T4aFoEPJkghxHaohaf4XMTJy6GMepIrQMJ2VDgrfTfyxF735zT uHw7dRSbCCmA2e/HtL8EYMH1r33feen+8fXIBlmdFX5Fdpo8btTOyyroGm0pE5sdyq6UV4hcqSrhd ByUda4GfJ5UozJzMVr59ZCz2mOpkCid/bHRuQ1W6+2QCM6KU3e3W+yyjc4BZmIBN78kHQKbOISh/h IIhW3SJb+jK3cjQn0hIQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i3IwN-00055Y-Hi; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:50:12 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i3IwK-000555-Fq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:50:09 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5885360; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.50] (e120937-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.50]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 366CC3F59C; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el To: Dave Martin References: <20190802170300.20662-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20190802170300.20662-5-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20190813162451.GB10425@arm.com> From: Cristian Marussi Message-ID: <91b30d04-e044-6b15-9435-0c1351e2af85@arm.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:50:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190813162451.GB10425@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190829_045008_618254_E443A78F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: andreyknvl@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 13/08/2019 17:24, Dave Martin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:02:53PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: >> Added 3 simple mangle testcases that mess with the ucontext_t > > Add > >> from within the sig_handler, trying to toggle PSTATE mode bits to > > signal handler > >> trick the system into switching to EL1/EL2/EL3. Expects SIGSEGV >> on test PASS. Ok >> >> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi >> --- >> .../arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore | 3 ++ >> .../mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ >> .../mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el2.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ >> .../mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el3.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 90 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1.c >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el2.c >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el3.c >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore >> index 8a0a29f0cc2a..226bb179b673 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore >> @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@ >> mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle >> mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits >> +mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1 >> +mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el2 >> +mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el3 > > What about having > > !*.[ch] > mangle_* > > rather than having to update .gitignore to list every test executable? > Yes it reduces inter-dependencies between testcases patches in fact, and in fact I already know all the possible name patterns on this set of tests: mangle_ fake_sigreturn_ >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..07aed7624383 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ >> +/* Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Limited */ >> + >> +#include "test_signals_utils.h" >> +#include "testcases.h" >> + >> +static int mangle_invalid_pstate_run(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, >> + ucontext_t *uc) >> +{ >> + ASSERT_GOOD_CONTEXT(uc); >> + >> + /* >> + * This config should trigger a SIGSEGV by Kernel >> + * when checking valid_user_regs() >> + */ >> + uc->uc_mcontext.pstate &= ~PSR_MODE_MASK; >> + uc->uc_mcontext.pstate |= PSR_MODE_EL1t; >> + >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> +struct tdescr tde = { >> + .sanity_disabled = true, >> + .name = "MANGLE_PSTATE_INVALID_MODE_EL1t", >> + .descr = "Mangling uc_mcontext with INVALID MODE EL1t", >> + .sig_trig = SIGUSR1, >> + .sig_ok = SIGSEGV, >> + .run = mangle_invalid_pstate_run, >> +}; > > These tests seem identical except for the EL number. > Can we macro-ise them? > > mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el1.c could become > > --8<-- > > #include "mangle_pstate_invalid_mode.h" > > DEFINE_TESTCASE_MANGLE_PSTATE_INVALID_MODE(1) > > -->8-- Yes I'll do, and I'll split these 3 testcases in 6 macro-ized test cases to cover all EL_x h/t variants (something you already told me in V2 I think) Cheers Cristian > > (for example). > > [...] > > Cheers > ---Dave > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel