public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] clk: exynos5420: register clocks using common clock framework
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:26:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9285029.CIld1HyBWB@amdc1227> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306181601.16795.arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd,

On Tuesday 18 of June 2013 16:01:16 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 June 2013, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> > >> +       [Core Clocks]
> > >> +
> > >> +  Clock                      ID
> > >> +  ----------------------------
> > >> +
> > >> +  fin_pll            1
> > >> +
> > >> +  [Clock Gate for Special Clocks]
> > >> +
> > >> +  Clock                      ID
> > >> +  ----------------------------
> > >> +  sclk_uart0         128
> > >> +  sclk_uart1         129
> > >> +  sclk_uart2         130
> > >> 
> > >> +
> > >> +   [Peripheral Clock Gates]
> > >> +
> > >> +  Clock                      ID
> > >> +  ----------------------------
> > >> +
> > >> +  aclk66_peric               256
> > >> +  uart0                      257
> > >> +  uart1                      258
> > > 
> > > It looks like these are actually separate things. Wouldn't it be more
> > > sensible to have separate device nodes for each of the lists and use a
> > > local index?> 
> > I have listed the parent clock first, then the child clocks, to
> > maintain  readability.
> > 
> > > What numbers are used in the data sheet?
> > 
> > I didn't get your point?
> 
> I would have expected three clock device nodes, one for fin_pll (presumably
> a fixed-rate clock?), one for "special clocks" and one for "peripheral
> clock gates", and a number space starting at '1' for each of them, rather
> than having a shared node and numbers starting at '1', '128' and '256',
> which looks a bit clumsy.
> 
> Did you take the ID number definitions from a data sheet, or did you make up
> the numbers yourself for the purpose of defining a binding?

This is a binding that has been defined for Samsung Common Clock Framework 
drivers. Exynos4 and Exynos5250 use the same convention. The numbers are 
defined in a way that should allow adding further clocks of particular types in 
future as need for such shows up.

Physically there is one clock controller (CMU) which has a lot of dividers, 
muxes and gates and so it is represented as a single device node.

Best regards,
Tomasz

> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc"
> in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 11:00 [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: Exynos: Add Exynos5420 SoC support Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ARM: dts: fork out common Exynos5 nodes Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:38   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-18  4:24     ` Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: dts: list the CPU nodes for Exynos5250 Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ARM: Exynos: Add support for Exynos5420 SoC Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] serial: samsung: select Exynos specific driver data if ARCH_EXYNOS is defined Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:45   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-18 10:31   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-18 15:19     ` 'Greg Kroah-Hartman'
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] ARM: Exynos: use four additional chipid bits to identify Exynos family Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] clk: exynos5420: register clocks using common clock framework Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:49   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-17 12:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18  4:09     ` Chander Kashyap
2013-06-18 14:01       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 14:26         ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-06-18 17:13           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] ARM: dts: Add initial device tree support for Exynos5420 Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:44   ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-18  4:21     ` Chander Kashyap
2013-06-18  7:36       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] clocksource: exynos_mct: use (request/free)_irq calls for local timer registration Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:53   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-18  4:11     ` Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ARM: Exynos: add secondary CPU boot base location for Exynos5420 Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ARM: Exynos: extend soft-reset support " Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 12:21   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18  4:10     ` Chander Kashyap
2013-06-17 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] ARM: Exynos: Add Exynos5420 SoC support Tomasz Figa
2013-06-17 11:56 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-18  4:28   ` Chander Kashyap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9285029.CIld1HyBWB@amdc1227 \
    --to=t.figa@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox