From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08116C4321E for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 07:34:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RvKl2g2nbmUatFDecXnZEazY84m/X0B5whHTWLqlT8k=; b=I0Rrk02Tf39+xh pbf1rGAkmnO+jZJbq/uicEHPUMTmpqHawdyCbpItqWokSq3Wwp8hEv7lN7joERQvqaN+e0d/s3f8R GuHtHHsZiOMS6ulC5vmmW7RmOpnsUCs1hvh1Rggn7cAkXXZgqfYRQchRMdbNzht1CkImyHON6fQZ4 Ltn1oHUl4TLFG91hD0F5KljJHzCEllFjD5Kzmge1Z2pWf2+FGxZYk7oD16pCXWD8sF+yeiF5nty4B pF5ZI5K2TV1BpgfhXXNFLn0dvPzNc2D0EZ+IyCHDG8tojbZcFU7xVyyHfucE1aABl+YXetqgM+H4t Gjty3MqK2dkLO43KqmcA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p25z2-00Fb0B-T5; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 07:33:49 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p25yy-00FaxM-Vb for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 07:33:46 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id p36so12826477lfa.12 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 23:33:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vKyvkeRamE9a3hWvsk2ihpAKYDCVRVxYyiAwylPFe8A=; b=LIKhtUFyXh0G/bghBM8oVR7yeeb5PKyfqo1/clecg5SD5xD+1TT3F0WFBAHDJDaQBH n0CK4GhDIB2CYYfcuYLAJ8nr5L5vrqYmAPQgk63FXei2LykNJkYmMMWbWjz7Q0kX7vos GERhXFSGxCv91XHcT5x5xhOKszlXTnrWDBT3kG1FgqGL3p93zbfERKbNj3zMHEoPtQ2A n91LV9CiX2paipVF1F+tKaSIkPSpSp+hMt5gCT8ZWclXhM9h+ryH4vhw5aAgJ+lWQ+1H 4Ua4DzdBMBodlmaVl7JaSHhVOR69QKFryxHPeXuBu6k3fdRVhOYcGnYtopgi3Kxbt9my Ac5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vKyvkeRamE9a3hWvsk2ihpAKYDCVRVxYyiAwylPFe8A=; b=blaFM0ZvDBnEezB+sxKaBPMIoi2i4m6Z0dl+MHRuPWcmUqP24b1p27pICi9zAhwfFQ Xytq8D5jGzUuSMf8W/rafOkIV9FMKv2D5ffi3iErdAFlmqw3StxZJj8uYliuRmfKStCw 6vgj/f4C0RBpzS0rotRrPdELCOPjh8Aaxv/XPSpMZINL+W/NfVEXxMhjW/B+GwTiMl9F WQJYgS0x4FQyzT//cSnVPwZ3ZVBNKJRCeEbLei3K54Lu3NtvSj7kabedOIvDp/HsU8Eg Wg3pgupwCllG57bV6fKVwfhXes6P1H3XGhvghKg1l6tVp4YgdqoG3ZzBuMwewu6bGIG3 ahsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmjNqfHLyRXLbm5cBxP21HYXiczv5V0U+V+w9SvKKMPUbZMingP oQKsezMmnF5mXICUrHiHxuRGJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5ikodifhglBYX/PfKt8BsPYKz7SE+18MCVYQBQHbRQFQs3Xt9PDn1r+0Ors1BkPLl4bYLNGQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46f7:0:b0:4b0:25f9:14f5 with SMTP id q23-20020ac246f7000000b004b025f914f5mr20568296lfo.506.1670225621140; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 23:33:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g3-20020a056512118300b0049ad2619becsm2028155lfr.131.2022.12.04.23.33.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Dec 2022 23:33:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92df8e1d-eb7b-ec0b-264f-a1a090cececc@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:33:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] usb: host: add xhci-exynos to support Exynos SOCs Content-Language: en-US To: Jung Daehwan Cc: Mathias Nyman , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , Mathias Nyman , Linus Walleij , Colin Ian King , Artur Bujdoso , Juergen Gross , Tomer Maimon , "open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , "open list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , open list , sc.suh@samsung.com, taehyun.cho@samsung.com, jh0801.jung@samsung.com, eomji.oh@samsung.com References: <1669860811-171746-1-git-send-email-dh10.jung@samsung.com> <1669860811-171746-3-git-send-email-dh10.jung@samsung.com> <20221205023413.GD54922@ubuntu> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20221205023413.GD54922@ubuntu> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221204_233345_101501_B5C5FF1F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 05/12/2022 03:34, Jung Daehwan wrote: >>> Am I missing something here? >> >> Because it is not a driver for Exynos... it's a driver for wakelocks for >> their specific Android use-cases which the manufacturer ships for their >> Android devices. Due to Google GKI, they try to squeeze into upstream. >> But this is huge misconception what should go to upstream and Samsung >> does not want to keep discussing. They just send random patches and >> disappear... >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> > > No. It's driver for Exynos. Currently It only has wakelocks but I will > submit one by one. Please think as the first patch of exynos not > squeezed. That's not how upstream kernel development works... Your code has nothing for Exynos. It's Android driver, not Exynos. If you say there is something for Exynos it must be visible here. Wakelocks are not relevant to Exynos, so after dropping them there would be empty stub in upstream kernel which obviously cannot be accepted. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel