From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com (Trond Myklebust) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:32:39 -0500 Subject: NFS client broken in Linus' tip In-Reply-To: <20140203202543.GA7070@infradead.org> References: <20140130141405.GA23985@infradead.org> <20140130142752.GX15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20140130143208.GB9573@infradead.org> <20140130153812.GA15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1391201970.6978.1.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> <20140203080325.GB806@infradead.org> <85AAFCF5-60EE-42E5-B103-37A4613C5947@primarydata.com> <20140203145759.GA30263@infradead.org> <3003D7E5-93F8-4B32-ACDB-07ED3F6CE70D@primarydata.com> <1391458935.17089.1.camel@leira.trondhjem.org> <20140203202543.GA7070@infradead.org> Message-ID: <93466B34-9D46-4AF2-8806-8CC5D3371F4D@primarydata.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Feb 3, 2014, at 15:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> FWIW, here is the alternative patch. I've tested it, and it seems to >> work. > > I much prefer the original one. One major point of the series was to > get individual filesystems out of the business of providing xattr > handlers for ACLs. > Then could you and Al please provide an Acked-by? This is a userspace API, so we shouldn?t be changing return values without good reason. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer