From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:45:50 -0000 Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better? In-Reply-To: References: <20131023174458.GC5208@netboy> <1382553982.31058.10.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <20131024095232.27BBCC4039D@trevor.secretlab.ca> <1382614439.6040.16.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <1382615278.8522.72.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20131024122346.GD11296@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1382619655.6040.52.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <516bfc7f9366ff3ef9187c36dd160888.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> <1382621431.6040.66.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <20131024141955.GB25061@ulmo.nvidia.com> <465e75de15f7d79c3b57a3b88024e739.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> Message-ID: <93d9a5ce228d03c4a183b06b00bd0442.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > So it is time IMHO that the description of how things *shall* work be > itself revised. It *is* being revised, with an explicit explicit understanding that things will have to change and a defined process for how to cope with that. That was discussed yesterday and we will be finishing the write-up to be presented at the Kernel Summit tomorrow. -- dwmw2